From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Thehutch86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 03:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Ecwzombie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ecwzombie.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Shaw's Supermarkets (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Temporary editing block for vandalism
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. More vandalism from you can result in a long term block. -- Infrogmation 16:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
please, I was unjustly blocked from editing.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I was trying to edit the Monson Maine Article as best as I could. My cousin Jim got on my account (he's 13) and started vandalizing the pages. I did put that Monson is under gang activity but that is because it is town news. So I don't see why I am to blame for posting recent news of the town. Read the police reports from the Piscataquis Observer and you will see what I am talking about. I also request that Ripogenus77 be banned from this site. He is unjustly classifying my factual errors."
Decline reason: "I see no reason for this block not to stand` -- Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Request for Unblock
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I believe I was unjustly blocked from editing. I have made many useful contributions to this site. I regret that I have made mistakes on here, some for comedic relief and others because they were in truth factual events (such as the gang reference in the Monson article - which honestly somebody reported in the town of Monson). It has been clearly shown that 90% of the time I delete the vandalism I created by accident or whoever was on my account. The user who blocked me Infrogmation could not be reached because he does not have a valid email address - however I DO have an address, if you clearly look at my records. Ripogenus77 believes that I delibrately vandalize every page. I do not vandalize. I do perhaps alter pages for a little bit, but as I can see now, it makes people mad. I have learned my lesson. This user also doesn't have an email address adn I couldn't contact her. I am completely sorry for what I did, but if I give the straight facts about a topic, I do not understand why i need to be punished. If this happened to all users I would feel like that it is worthless to use this site. Again, about 80-90% of the edits I do are correct and in the obvious advantage of an occasionaly edit, there is no problem (as far as I see) doing this. Nobody looks at Wikipedia for Monson, or anything I edit to play around with. I believe that the users who have reported me for misuse should provide a VALID email address, so they can justly tell me why I am being blocked and tell me to stop."
Decline reason: "On appeal, I've downgraded your block to 48 hours (with time served) for a first time Wikipedia:Vandalism offense. You were mainly blocked for [1], [2] and editing someone else's user page [3] is a definite no-no. -- Netsnipe ► 07:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Wikipedia is not a playground. You and you alone are responsible for the edits made by your account. If you cannot secure your account, it will be indefinitely blocked next time for that reason. Please make a note. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, I'm sorry, I may or may not have been inhibited or something. Drunk monkey duck duck goose
- That's not a very encouraging message. Take your time off to review Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers, the Wikipedia:Manual of Style if you wish to edit responsibly in line with info there after the block expires. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 16:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Colbert
Thanks for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. I hope you can help us out! Dave6 03:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
More vandalism after all the warnings, previous block, appeal, and discussion? Yawn, troll.
-- Infrogmation 04:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "all in the sport of fun although I thought I deleted that. I am not a troll, hell I barely edit on this page anymore. You sir are an ass."
Decline reason: "And you, sir, will not get unblocked with that kind of request. See WP:NPA. Do not issue another request. -- Sandstein 06:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "you want me to get down on my knees and pray forgiveness? You are not Jesus or God. So I made a mistake (or two) - whats your problem, it gets fixed within minutes, I see people posting more irreverant stuff on here like how Salvia is like LSD and how Keith Sells has had the most WWE Championship Titles - yet none of these get deleted. I love wikipedia, and I only do things on impulse I have OCD and ADD, and when someone asks you a favor to do something you do it right? It was all fun for the most part. Satire. 99.9% of people out there know that ONE human can't create 3 Times the population of Elephants in 2 years or they KNOW that Shaw's Supermarkets isn't gay or owned by Alan Fairbanks. It's all just out of fun."
Decline reason: "Colbert Troll, posted offwiki request for harassment of blocking admin. [4] -- Vary Talk 07:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
