User talk:The stuart/archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an Archive of messages left for The_stuart on his Talk Page. Please don't edit this page, as for reasons of historical accuracy. If you would like to leave him a message do so at his talk page.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Razorback.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Razorback.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 03:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Rayjohnson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rayjohnson.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 10:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Bunny Y.JPG
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Bunny Y.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 11:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cartoon controversy
Did you forget to log in when you made that vote in the first column, or is some anon IP parodying your votes? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 22:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I'll properly attribute the vote to you then, who knows what screwed up. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 23:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Stuart, why did you vote for all three options? Wanna rectify that? Babajobu 23:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CARTOONS OF MOHAMMED
Showing the figures of Mohammed is disturbing muslims. And it is a insult to Islam. In Islam making and also looking the figures of Mohammed is forbidden.That is raping the holy things of Islam.And it is not about "freedom".PLEASE get back your sıgnature.Thanks.--Erdemsenol 00:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Oskar Sala.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Oskar Sala.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 08:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:RockyStatue.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RockyStatue.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use image
Hello! I noticed that you had Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg shown on your user page. The image is uploaded under a fair use provision, and Wikipedia policy states that fair use images should not be displayed on any pages outside the main (article) namespace, including user pages. Would you mind removing the image or simply linking to it? (Add a ":" in from of the image, like this: [[:Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg]]) Thanks a lot! Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Bunny_Y.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Bunny_Y.JPG. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 13:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UArk Article
Hey there, a user named Dpbsmith left the following on my discussion section:
- Continuing with my assumption that you are connected with UArk... many universities have official "archivists" or "historians," often affiliated with the library, and it might be worth the effort of trying to meet with one and get some suggestions on where to go for material for the UArk history section. You might ask about this rather odd-sounding statement that comes up in a Google book search for "frederick rudolph" "university of arkansas" fayetteville:
- The new university spirit was likely to turn up almost anywhere, and in 1884, although the president of the University of Arkansas actually rejected it, he publicly charged that two subversive-minded faculty members had imported from the University of Virginia the two habits that were doing Arkansas the most harm: high standards of scholarship and faculty neglect of student conduct outside the classroom.
- Dpbsmith (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
I graduated from Arkansas, but unfortunately I no longer attend, or live anywhere near the University. I thought I would pass on his comments to you because I had the feeling that you might still attend, and since you were the one that recommended the article to be featured. Later man, (Cardsplayer4life 19:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Image:Mombi.JPG
needs source and copyright information.--Duk 08:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Recycling AfD
You previously voted keep on an AfD for LJ Drama. It was re-nominated to AfD out of spite here, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LJ Drama, and I thought you might like to consider voting again. SchmuckyTheCat 02:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Oskar_Sala.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oskar_Sala.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.
[edit] Image:Soophie_nun_squad.jpg
Can you please provide source information for this totally fucking awesome image? Phil Sandifer 18:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Quit It
Quit referring to yourself in the third person in your user page profile job. It is annoying. Hüsker Dü kicks ass
[edit] Gadsby
The reason the Gadsby article said "typing contraction" instead of "typewriter" is that the article itself was written without e's, as you may have noticed. As this has been causing some annoyance recently (and has always caused some horrible ugliness in the article), and is clearly not terribly encyclopedia-like, I'm going to do away with this throughout the article. Let's see if it lasts. Robin Johnson 16:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:California raisins.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:California raisins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 22:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Residents.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Residents.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dogpatch46.jpg)
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Dogpatch46.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 21:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Henning.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Henning.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 07:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Also Image:Kitchendebate.gif. -- bluemask 11:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Images-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Images-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Henning.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Henning.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Perdue.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Perdue.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Kitchendebate.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Kitchendebate.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hey Stu! :))
Haven't seen you forever, lol. What's goin' on bud? If you need any kind of help on images, check out User talk:Pfctdayelise. Wonderful woman. She knows what it is and what it's about, lol. She's been there and done that. --RogerK 05:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hey again, Stu :)). The link you gave (http://www.zwire.com/site/index.cfm?newsid=16410021&BRD=1815&PAG=461&dept_id=59849&rfi=8) in Dogpatch USA doesn't bring up an interview with Carr. Just an article that talks about what's goin' on at the park. Is this the link you meant to include? Miss you, bud :). --RogerK 21:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Techno.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Techno.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 04:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hey, another University of Arkansas Wikipedian!
Nice pictures of buildings of the U of A! I'm also here, as referenced by the title :). I was looking at the Arkansas Union picture and wondering if you'd be offended if I uploaded a picture of the Arkansas Union now in Spring with the fountain going and everything. The current one doesn't really paint too good a picture with the leafless trees and fountain not going and all. :)
130.184.236.25 18:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- I don't really care, but you will have to register first.--The_stuart 18:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Thought I did; oh well. Thanks! Craig3410 20:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Hello my friend
Hey Stu :)), nice to talk to you again. Hope everything is well with you and yours. I've put Adelle Davis up for peer review. Would you take a look and let me know what you think? --RogerK 03:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Dyslexic Wikipedians
Category:Dyslexic Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. --Salix alba (talk) 16:42, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Technodrome comercial.jpg listed for deletion
—Ritchy 21:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Uncertain
I am not quite sure of what to make out of your quest agaisnt numerous trivia sections. True, some trivia may be in ill nature or have no purpose of existing on Wikipedia. Also, the term trivia may be the incorrect one. However, I strongly believe that something that outlines numerous little tidbits of facts that can not cleanly fit into an article should exist. It seems in the best nature of placing things that are relevant but don't flow with the whole article. The trivia section is similar to having a conversation with someone about a prelevant issue and they add, "Oh, did you know...?" I strongly believe trivia should exist but underneath a whole new term. Please leave your opinion on my talk page. Yanksox 18:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I see where you are coming from. However, some of the pages (i.e. Krusty, US Presidents) the pieces of "trivia" are actually outlines of certain facts (Presidents that had assination attempts, voting results, etc.). It is somewhat troubling seeing both sides, trivia can seem something that is unprofessional, however, it is extremly useful maybe under a different title. Yanksox 18:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
So, that warrants outright removal? Why not just change it or add a cleanup tag?Yanksox 18:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
It seems that the only thing you have against trivia is the title is goes under. If the sections were instead titled "Interesting facts" it seems you would have no problem with them, which is, in fact, what is meant by the word "trivia" in those cases (even though, as you pointed out, the real meaning of "trivia" is the opposite). Anyways, I hope that you return to every article in which you have moved the trivia and check to see the progress of integrating the information into the article after some time has passed. Qutezuce 21:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Kolkata trivia
Hi! You have quite correctly presented the case for deletion of the article Kolkata trivia in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkata trivia. Despite being one of the main contributors in the article, I agree with the proposal for deletion.(I have not voted yet though). However, I would like to incorporate some interesting facts in some other article related to Kolkata. I just want a suggestiom. As incorporating may be a time-consuming matter, should I keep the article in a subpage of my userpage? I dont think such a subpage would be put for AfD! Also, usually how much time is given before an article is on AfD and is deleted? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, ok, I have copied the article in my user subpage. I will take some time to see if I can find out some way ro avoid the AfD. I do not see any hope though! The case is just too perfect. Really, wikipedia should not contain such articles. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Look, I still am very impressed with the way you presented the case for deletion. However, it is after the comments by Hornplease that there are more trivia articles, I changed my vote. I also admit that by definition, encyclopedia is not a place for trivias. What about other trivia pages? Have you/anybody else tagged those?--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- I was watching other trivia pages that have been put for AfD. IMO all the articles should be deleted. However, consensus is not building up. Also, in most of the cases, these trivia articles were created to make main articles less congested. So merging is often not possible always. For example, Kolkata is an FA, and it would be difficult, if not impossible, to merge. So is the case with some other articles. What do you think? Can we change the names? Say, "Interesting facts on xyz"? It sounds childish! What is your opinion on creating a section called "Trivia" under a related article, say, in case of Kolkata, History of Kolkata and Kolkata culture, and then merge the trivia points accordingly? This can be at least a temporary measure, with a view to do away with that "Trivia" section eventually, when incorporating those facts within already existing sections would done. I am telling this because incorporation, where possivle, is going to take long time.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Look, I still am very impressed with the way you presented the case for deletion. However, it is after the comments by Hornplease that there are more trivia articles, I changed my vote. I also admit that by definition, encyclopedia is not a place for trivias. What about other trivia pages? Have you/anybody else tagged those?--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Loung Ung
Would you review this article for me please. Thanks. --RogerK 06:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia
Ok, so your argument for trivia that should be included in Wikipedia is that it is wrong to include it in some sort of list form and instead should be incorporated into the articles prose. The problem with this is that some information is simply presented better in list form then by unnaturally forcing it into prose. Qutezuce 19:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree that trivas done in list forms do look better, if done corectly otherwise they look stupid Samaster1991 09:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ryan Avery
Hello! Because of your interest in similar musicians, I wanted to direct you to the Ryan Avery article and the corresponding [[1]]. Thanks! PT (s-s-s-s) 20:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] George W. Bush's second term as President of the United States
Thanks for your compliments. My interest and participation in politics has flourished (I suppose you can saw "come of age") in President Bush's second term, and resources like The Week have reminded me of important related major issues and events in that time period. I noted such things that I figured might be of use and largely worked from there using my knowledge. I tried to be as appropriately comprehensive and impartial as possible, often with the aid of Wikipedia articles already written. I hope the article does not grossly lack references or a satisfactory reference style, the latter the morely likely of the two. I so far have not uploaded any images to Wikipedia, one or two more of which the 2006 events section may benefit from in particular. So I hope my work is not too unorthodox or unpolished, but I think it important to get the information out there on this increasingly reputable and used encyclopedia, in as encyclopedic fashion as possible; I certainly couldn't say whether my work deserves an award, especially when it makes assertions that may very well demand ommitted references or not be appropriate to Wikipedia, for example the effect the Cheney hunting incident had on the vice president's relationship with Bush, which I felt was true, notable, and widely said.
By the way, may the best team win today in the football game hosted by the University of Arkansas against the University of Southern California; from appearances I expect you'll be at the stadium. Enjoy!
Oh, and I greatly respect politically and intellectually one of Arkansas' proudest products, Bill Clinton. Minutiaman 07:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned public domain images
The following images were uploaded by you, but are currently not in use. They have been tagged as public domain (PD), either as PD-self or other PD claim, or equivilant. These unused PD images may be subject to deletion as orphans. You may wish to add them to an article, tag them for copying to WP commons {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} or if they are no longer needed, they can be nominated for deletion by following the easy three step process at Images and media for deletion. If you have any questions, please leave me a note on my talk page. --Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Dogpatch.jpg
- Image:Born to lead statue.jpg
- Image:Born to lead.jpg
- Image:Hog.png
- Image:Back to the future time line1.PNG
- Image:General T Cornpone.JPG
- Image:Perpendicularline.JPG
- Image:Gogh.starry-night.jpg