User talk:The Prince Manifest/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Image Tagging Image:Shorten.jpg 2 Image copyright problem with Image:Whitlam-rally.jpg 3 Image Tagging Image:Colston.jpg 4 Image copyright problem with Image:Brumby.jpg 5 Image Tagging Image:Kerrproclamationbysecretary.jpg 6 Image copyright problem with Image:Barnett.jpg 7 Image copyright problem with Image:MattBirney.jpg 8 Image copyright problem with Image:IanCampbell.jpg 9 Image copyright problem with Image:Chipp.jpg 10 Image Tagging for Image:Eban.jpg 11 Image copyright problem with Image:ClareMartin.jpg 12 Image Tagging for Image:Pdebnam.jpg 13 Image copyright problem with Image:Crean.jpg 14 Image Tagging for Image:Zalman_shazar.jpg 15 Orphanbot Deletion Speed 16 Page Blanking 17 Woah 18 Hi 19 Janet Powell 20 Great timing on your first edit to Allegations of Israeli apartheid 21 Work Choices

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Shorten.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shorten.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairusein|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --SCEhardT 04:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Whitlam-rally.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whitlam-rally.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. the iBook of the Revolution 22:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Colston.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Colston.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 08:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Brumby.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brumby.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -- Longhair 07:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Kerrproclamationbysecretary.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kerrproclamationbysecretary.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 09:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Barnett.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barnett.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 04:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:MattBirney.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MattBirney.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. BRossow 03:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:IanCampbell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IanCampbell.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Chipp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chipp.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Eban.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eban.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:ClareMartin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ClareMartin.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Pdebnam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pdebnam.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Crean.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crean.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:26, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Zalman_shazar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zalman_shazar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphanbot Deletion Speed

Hi Carnildo. Your Orphanbot has been alerting me to several images I posted without proper copyright information. However, rather than giving me the seven days required to allow me to find the information, it appears to be deleting them shortly after informing. I'm not sure if this is a malfunction or not, but it's quite annoying not being given notice (even if there are copyright problems). Evolver of Borg 11:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

OrphanBot does not and is not capable of deleting images.

That aside, there's no rule requiring that you be notified seven days before the image is deleted, or even notified at all. The specific rule is that an image without proper source or copyright information can be deleted starting seven days after it is uploaded. This is usually interpreted as being seven days after the image is identified and tagged as being a "no source" or "no copyright" image.

OrphanBot does not notify people about all images. In order to prevent prolific uploaders from being flooded with notices, OrphanBot will notify someone about no more than one image a day, the idea being that they will then check every image they uploaded to ensure that they have provided the information needed. Notifications are usually issued about six days before the image is eligible for deletion.

To give uploaders (or anyone else who may be watching) a final warning, OrphanBot will remove an image from every page using it no more than two days before it becomes eligible for deletion.

--Carnildo 08:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Page Blanking

On 22-June, you blanked Simon Wai. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I've reverted it to the previous version. If this was the result of a broken edit, you may wish to make the correct edits. If you believe the redirect should be deleted, please follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures. If you believe an article should be written instead of the redirect, please write a stub. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 15:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Woah

Just wandering by..I went to Bialik as well (graduated '01) and we were born on the same day..and obviously you're a Trekkie. Very strange. Long live the Melbournian Jewish geeks! Fryboy

[edit] Hi

Hi Evolver of Borg. Would you mind e-mailing me? Jayjg ^(talk) 16:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Janet Powell

Don't take edits personally and don't respond by posting indignant messages on people's talk pages. Your original edit, which I changed, was wrong. Your edit stated: "She left in 2004 to join the Greens..." As I stated when I made my edit: "She did not leave to join the Greens in 2004, she left the Democrats in 1992 to form her own party. I have added this information." OK, so she joined the Greens in 2004 (I couldn't verify the information at the time and, besides, it's hardly of interest) - but she didn't leave the party in 2004 to join them. That is the correction I was making. -- User:CumberlandsAshes81

[edit] Great timing on your first edit to Allegations of Israeli apartheid

Hi Evolver of Borg. I was looking through the history of the AoIA article and it seems that your first edit to the article, a revert in a widespread revert war (this edit [1]) happened today -- see [2]. It's timing was impeccable. I was wondering how it is you happened upon that article at that exact time - can you explain? Just trying to understand the strangeness that has been going on with that article. --Ben 01:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't have anything to do with this [3], does it?--Ben 01:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

How bizarre; a post from 3 months ago caused Evolver of Borg to edit an article yesterday. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Anyways, it was really frustrating today since that revert war was based on a misunderstanding. No one did undo all of SV's edits and I had taken the changes to the talk page. Going forward, it is best to use the talk page rather than have a pile one, pile ones only encourage one side to be left with bad taste of feeling bullied, as SV mentioned on the AoIA talk page [4] -- something that needs to be avoided. --Ben 02:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

What's even more frustrating is your on-going conspiracism and bad faith. It's enough already Ben, it really is. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Work Choices

Hi Borg, nice to hear from you. I don't claim any great expertise on Work Choices and I'm not sure I want to get involved in that article, but I will have a look. I'm leaving Danby's office at the end of the year and will be doing some travelling in 2007, so my direct interest in Australian politics will decline for a while. I hope you enjoyed election night as much as I did. Adam 04:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)