User talk:The 13th 4postle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome! & EE
Hello, The 13th 4postle! I'm ulayiti, and I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, and I hope you'll like the place enough to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- How to avoid common mistakes
When commenting on talk pages or voting, you should always sign your name by typing in four tildes (~~~~). This way people will know who made the comment and can respond to you. If you have any questions at all, feel free to ask me on my talk page. You can also have a look at the help pages or put up a question at the village pump. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing!
By the way, I modified your edits to IB Diploma Programme and Extended Essay a bit. There is no minimum number of words for the EE, it just has to have enough stuff in it. - ulayiti (talk) (my RfA) 10:35, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Nasser_talking.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nasser_talking.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] English
Please see WP:DATE. Bolivian Unicyclist 15:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You are not being civil
And you are wrong, here is a background Decimal separator, as for my education it is fine thank you very much. But I believe you hate Chavez and that does not contribute to a NPOV article. Flanker 15:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please refrain from personal attacks
Could I suggest that mundane editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following:
- Remain polite per WP:Civility.
- Solicit feedback and ask questions.
- Keep the discussion focused. Concentrate on a small set of related matters and resolve them to the satisfaction of all parties.
- Focus on the subject rather than on the personalities of the editors.
Thanks!
I don't appreciate being called a crony[1]
BTW you forgot to read this part: "However, as the middle dot was already in common use in the mathematics world to indicate multiplication, the SI rejected this use of the middle dot as the decimal separator." SI > US or UK. Flanker 16:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!
Please refrain from calling me a crony,[2] I am not what you accuse me or attack me for being. As for SI I prefer using scientific standards as opposed to weird traditional ones. Flanker 20:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I ask you again to be civil
It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars. I don't know how moving[3] a candidate that bows out of the race is supposed to be biased, my edits are in good faith, so please I ask again that this be civil.[4] Flanker 22:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. JRSP 22:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please check the WP:3RR policy: "Editors who revert a page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours, except in certain special circumstances, are likely to be blocked from editing" Please, discuss differences in talk page. JRSP 22:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You have to assume good faith
I appreciate the apology, and yes it was a coincidence. I was re-reading the article again and it struck me, what the heck is Rausseu doing here? So I moved it, it was as simple as that. Flanker 22:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have to prove good faith... it is simply something you do to others and expect in return. I saw it today, did not like it and moved it, that is what wikipedia is about WP:bold Flanker 22:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- WP:bold is not a rule it is a guideline, it simply means don't be afraid of changing something simply because it has been like that for a while. There are other rules for changing stuff, but statements like "well it has been that way since forever until you changed it" is not really applicable. Flanker 22:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR block
Hello. You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to a 3RR violation. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks in advance. El_C 08:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please sign your comments
As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. JRSP 16:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No personal attacks, please.
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Pilotguy (push to talk) 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No vandalism, please
Your edits to Daniel Brandt can be considered vandalism. *Dan T.* 04:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)