The election of Uthman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Uthman ibn Affan, the third caliph, was chosen by a council meeting in Medina, in northwestern Arabia, in 23 AH (644) [1].
The second caliph, Umar ibn al-Khattab, was stabbed by an angry Persian slave. Mindful of the tumults that had occurred after the death of Muhammad (see Succession to Muhammad), on his deathbed Umar appointed a committee of six men, to choose a new leader.
Contents |
[edit] Preparation
He wished this consultation, or shura, to survive the strictest criticism. The six men were:
- Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf
- Sad ibn Abi Waqqas
- Uthman ibn Affan
- Ali ibn Abi Talib
- Zubayr ibn al-Awwam
- Talha ibn Ubayd-Allah
Umar's expectation seems to have been that the group should choose one among themselves who would be acceptable to all.
Talha was absent and did not reach Medina until after the decision had been made. The choice of a new ruler for the new Islamic empire fell to five men.
[edit] Accounts
At his death bed, Umar ibn al-Khattab (d.644) nominated a board of six members who were required to elect one of themselves as the next caliph. The group consisted of Sad Ibn Abi Waqqas, Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf, Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, Talha ibn Ubayd Allah, Ali ibn Abi Talib and Uthman ibn Affan. Out of the six members, Zubair withdrew his candidature in favor of Ali. Talha withdrew in favor of Uthman and Sad ibn Abi Waqas withdrew in favor of Abd al-Rahman. Out of the three remaining candidates Abd al-Rahman decided to withdraw, leaving Uthman and Ali. Abd al-Rahman was appointed as the arbitrator to choose between the remaining two candidates. Contacting the two candidates separately, he put to them the question whether they would follow in the footsteps of the previous caliphs. Ali said that he would do so as far as posssible subject to his best judgement in the light of the Quran and Sunnah. Uthman replied to the question in the affirmative without any reservation. Thereupon, Abd al-Rahman gave his verdict in favor of The election of Uthman.[2]
Accounts of this consultation vary widely.
An accepted sunni version of this account shows a tie in votes between all three hazrat Uthman, hazrat Abd Al Rahman and hazrat Ali e Murtooza (May Allah be well pleased with all of them) where hazrat Uthman and hazrat Ali (may Allah be well pleased with both of them) voted in favor of their respective partner in the elections. Then Abd Al Rahman (May Allah be well pleased with him) suggested to allow him to withdraw his candidature at the cost of the choice for leadership between the two remaining candidates. He was allowed to do so and he chose hazrat Uthman (May Allah be well pleased with him) as the new caliph.
[edit] Wilferd Madelung
According to the historian Wilferd Madelung, only Uthman and Ali were willing to take the burden of the caliphate. Each of them said that he was willing to swear allegiance to the other if not chosen. It was up to the three remaining members to make the choice. Sa'd is said to have slightly favored Ali. Al-Zubayr supported Uthman. 'Abd al-Rahman thus had the deciding vote. According to Madelung's account of the shura, 'Abd al-Rahman delayed announcing his choice until he faced a public meeting at the mosque, where he announced his choice of Uthman. Ali, who was present, was thus under pressure to immediately give his allegiance, his bay'ah, to Uthman, which he did accordingly.
[edit] Al-Tabari
The early Muslim historian Al-Tabari gives a more detailed version of Umar's supposed words setting up the consultation [3].
[edit] John Glubb
The British historian John Glubb summarizes the matter thus:
[edit] Aslan
Some accounts say that Uthman was chosen because he promised to continue the policies of Abu Bakr and Umar, whereas Ali would make no such promise [5].
[edit] Suyuti
Suyuti quotes the following:
[edit] Shia view
Shi'a Muslims argue that the election should not have happened at all. They say that Muhammad had clearly indicated that he wished Ali to succeed him (see Succession to Muhammad) and that every successive choice of a different caliph was defiance of Muhammad's wishes. Ali did not desire power; he wanted to carry out the duties he had been given by his cousin Muhammad. Shi'a also deny that Ali gave his allegiance to Uthman. Ali is quoted saying:
- But good Heavens! what had I to do with this "consultation"? Where was any doubt about me with regard to the first of them (caliphs) that I was now considered akin to these ones (in this consultation)? Sermon of ash-Shiqshiqiyyah
and:
- "You (Uthman) know very well that I deserve the caliphate more than anyone else" (Nahj al Balagha sermon 77)
Sa'id Akhtar Rizvi, a 21st century Shi'a twelver Islamic scholar writes:
Aalimnetwork on al-islam.org quotes:
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ http://www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/kuficsaud.html
- ^ Masudul Hasan, Hadrat Ali, Islamic Publications Ltd. Lahore
- ^ These may not be his exact words; the trustworthiness of the early oral traditions are much disputed, see Historiography of early Islam
- ^ History of the Prophets and Kings by Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari, Vol 3, pp. 294-295
- ^ Aslan, No God But God, 2005
- ^ History of the Caliphs by Suyuti [1]
- ^ Imamate: The Vicegerency of the Prophet al-islam.org [2]
- ^ Aalimnetwork on al-islam.org
also:
- Aslan, Reza -- No God But God, Random House, 2005.
- Glubb, Sir John Bagot -- The Great Arab Conquests, 1967.
- Madelung, W. -- The Succession to Muhammad, Cambridge University Press, 1997.