The Templar Revelation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Last Supper

Leonardo da Vinci, 1495–1497

Tempera on gesso, pitch and mastic

460 × 880 cm

Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan

The Templar Revelation: Secret Guardians of the True Identity of Christ is a pseudohistory book written by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince and published in 1997 by Transworld Publishers Ltd in Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand. It proposes a hypothesis regarding the relationship between Jesus, John the Baptist and Mary Magdalene, and states that their true story has been suppressed by the Roman Catholic Church through, among other tactics, the conscious selection of the texts that make up the canonical New Testament, their campaigns against heresy, and their propaganda against non-Christians.

While researching the life and works of Leonardo da Vinci, including "his part in faking the Turin Shroud" which the authors document in their book "Turin Shroud— In Whose Image?", they discover a number of signs of unorthodox Christian thinking in the imagery used to portray some of the central characters in the New Testament, especially John the Baptist. Some paintings examined for their unusual choice of imagery include the two versions of "Madonna of the Rocks" and "The Last Supper".

In the latter painting, they propose that the person in the painting seated, from a viewer’s point-of-view, to the left of Jesus is Mary Magdalene rather than John the Apostle, as most art historians identify that person. Furthermore, they point out that their body angles form the letter M, a reference to the Magdalene, and that she and Jesus are dressed in similar but oppositely colored clothes, a negative image of each other. They also mention a number of other signs: a mystery knife pointed at one of the characters, that Leonardo da Vinci himself is in the painting with his face pointing away from Jesus, and that Jesus is confronted by an admonishing hand to his right making “the John gesture”, an index finger pointing up.

In trying to understand the significance of these unusual images they conducted research into what they term a “thread of heresy” that reaches back over 2000 years. They find evidence for this occult tradition in such assorted subjects as The Knights Templar, the Cathars, Gnosticism, the Holy Grail, and the legends connected with southern France, and in particular the town of Rennes-le-Château. They back up their findings by citing the historical and biblical scholarship of such people as Morton Smith, Hugh J. Schonfield, G.R.S Mead, Frances A. Yates, and Geza Vermes.

Among their conclusions are the following:

• Jesus was a disciple of John the Baptist, and that John’s religious teachings were essentially that of the Egyptian mystery religion of Isis-Osiris-Horus
• Jesus was initiated into the inner circle of John the Baptist, but was not selected to succeed him. Rather it was Simon Magus who was selected as John the Baptist’s successor.
• Mary Magdalene had a ritualized, “sacred” sexual relationship with Jesus, in keeping with their religious beliefs, and as his “initiator” into the sacred mysteries had an equal relationship to Jesus
• Politics and religion were synonymous in ancient Palestine, and Jesus was an astute and aggressive political competitor against John
• The Jesus group may have been responsible for the death of John the Baptist
• Jesus’ disciples were not initiated into the inner mysteries of his teachings
• The term "Christ" had a different significance to the participants in the biblical drama than they do nowadays. To those in John the Baptist’s circle it would have referred to all who were baptized and initiated into the arcana of their belief system.
• Jesus was a magician, and that there was a transmission of power from John to Jesus through the beheading of John. They note that only after this beheading is Jesus recorded to have performed miracles.
• Numerous images and stories in the canonical New Testament are in actuality adaptations of those found in other religious traditions, and are not unique
• Jesus is one in a line of many "dying-and-rising" gods, who share many similar traits

The authors offer, but not claim, that perhaps Leonardo da Vinci was sending veiled messages through his art, which could be understood only by others who were open to their meaning. And while on the surface these paintings seem to be simple biblical depictions, they represent in fact his belief in the superiority of John the Baptist over Jesus.

Seven years after this book was published, some of the ideas presented in this and other similar books, have became central to the best-selling novel The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown. It may seem that The Templar Revelation even provided Brown with the title of his novel: one chapter is called "The Secret Code of Leonardo Da Vinci". Brown's reliance on The Templar Revelation is also confirmed by the fact that he imports certain factual errors from this book (see Saint-Sulpice_(Paris) for an example).

[edit] Criticism

Picknett and Prince's book was inspired by The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Henry Lincoln and Richard Leigh (1982). Unfortunately, Picknett and Prince took Baigent et al's book at face value and fully accepted their claims that the so-called Priory of Sion was a real, medieval, secret society. They were either unaware of or totally ignored the evidence that the "Priory" was a Twentieth Century hoax perpetrated by an anti-Semite French royalist. As a result, their entire thesis rests on a premise which no credible historian accepts and their ideas are, therefore, generally regarded by professional historians as entirely worthless. They are still regarded as an authority on these matters by amateurs and New Agers and are not taken seriously by real researchers.

[edit] References

• History vs The Da Vinci Code Analysis of the historical claims made in The Da Vinci Code, with frequent criticisms of the premises and content of The Templar Revelation.