Talk:Theodore Olson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Theodore ever remarry?
Why did he step down from his office in July 2004?
[edit] Campaign contributions
I'm wondering about the encyclopedicness of the external link posted by anonymous user User:68.173.19.193 that links to a page showing the political contributions made by the subject of the article. The anon has evenhandedly posted the equivalent link on numerous biographical articles of persons both on the left and the right (e.g. Molly Ivins, Robert McNamara, Theodore Olson, Alex Kozinski, and several others), but despite saucing both the goose and the gander having these links in the articles doesn't seem right. Yes, it's factual; yes, it's verifiable; yes, it's interesting; but it still seems like a sly bit of POV, particularly for each individual article viewed in isolation. I haven't removed any of the links but I'm curious how others see this.
I've posted this question on the talk pages of all four articles mentioned above in hopes that a wider spectrum of editors will see and comment. -EDM 05:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
FWIW, I had the same reaction. Maybe Molly Ivins is a red herring?
-ConDissenter 00:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Religious Faith
- What is the religious faith of judge Theodore Olson?
-
-
-
- I'm not sure, does anyone know if he's the same Theodore Olson who is an editor at Christianity Today?
-
-
[edit] What did the investigation concern?
The article mentions that Olson was investigated by Morrison, but neither this page nor the Morrison v. Olson page describe for what crime or allegation he was being investigated. Would be helpful to know more.
http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/05/14/independent_counsel/index.html
BTW, his skeptical view of the Independent Counsel statute was later vindicated by events, and is now generally accepted by both major parties.
IIRC, a senior (liberal) judge testifying on behalf of then Judge Samuel Alito during his confirmation hearings even asserted that the outcome of Morrison, if decided today's Court, would have been much different.
Ruthfulbarbarity 09:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- That his skeptical view of the Independent Counsel statute was later vindicated by events, and is now generally accepted by both major parties, is debatable.
Categories: Biography articles of living people | Politics and government work group articles | Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Low-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Politics and government work group articles needing infoboxes | Biography articles needing infoboxes | Start-Class biography articles