Talk:Then Came Bronson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Then Came Bronson article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-Importance on the importance scale.

[edit] POV Tag

The extra information on the show is good, but it needs to be re-written to be more encyclopedic and represent a neutral POV. -- MisterHand 06:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay. I am new to Wiki, but I'll get the hang of it. I have edited the article to present, what I believe, is a neutral POV.-- Luigibob 23:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 1, 2006 changes

I've made several changes to the article and removed the tag. All the deleted material is in history, so if it needs to be added back in in some form it can be easily retrieved. Here's what I changed, and why:

• Removed "forlorn" in the description of Bronson, felt POV.
• Removed flowery intro about "The Odyssey" and "On the Road." While well written, it wasn't very encyclopedic and read like original research. However, if we can attribute some of these statements to an external notable source, it could be added back in some form.
• Removed the dialogue. I couldn't figure out how it helped the article or why it was important. If that can be asserted, then this too could be reinstated.
• Reformatted the guest stars information into an easier-to-read list.

I didn't want to step on any toes by removing material, just get the article to a place where we could remove the POV tag. -- MisterHand 00:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 22, 2007 edits

Well, I'm no longer new to Wiki and the changes I've made reflect POV deletes. Also, the previous edits to OVERVIEW were written like a television review, which were good, yet not an encyclopedic entry. Many deletes and corrections to reflect this view. Luigibob 03:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)