Talk:The Wilderness Society (Australia)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
The Wilderness Society (Australia) is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wilderness Society (Australia) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies

Contents

[edit] earlier conversations

Just in case there is a backlash with changes in this article, it reads like no NPOV is in operation in this article, as the TWS and its members were not necessarily connected to either the UTG or Greens in the way the article is written is suggesting.60.230.244.206 04:59, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

ok, should be resolved. the non-partisan policy information is from a collegue who has volunteered for TWS previously. it might be availiable on the web somewhere, I haven't looked. --naught101 10:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] page moving

Template:Move to The Wilderness Society (AUS) the organisation is now known as simply "The Wilderness Society", not the "Tasmanian Wilderness Society," as seen on their website
the page should be moved to

perhaps there should be a disambiguation page?--naught101 09:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

done, perhaps there still needs to be a disambiguation page, but maybe we can wait for the american TWS to appear first.--naught101 09:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] factualitly

is there such a word? oh well
what's the factual accuracy dispute for? --naught101 10:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New move request

[edit] Intro red link

Removed red link in intro Land Clearing it has been there for a long time, no one has worked upon it, and even if it is an issue, wilderness was a primary issue. Someone wants to pick it up again - please do but at least get red of the red link! SatuSuro 01:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Radical?

A red link user has attempted to place this term in the first sentence. It is inappropriate, on the basis if the WS is described as 'radical' - what does this then make Gunns ? SatuSuro 06:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)