Talk:The Western Star
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
A Wikipedian removed The Western Star from the good article list. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. |
 |
This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. |
 |
The Western Star has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
[edit] Days of the week
Please do not remove the days of the week listed under publication history. They are included to show what day of the week the paper appeared on. 66.213.119.98 17:29, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 04:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] And its over!
In a 4 to 0 GA/R, this article has been delisted, primarily for lack of inline citations. Also, the founding section could probably be split into two sections at least. Review archived at Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 14. Homestarmy 13:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
