Talk:The Patriotic Publishing Co.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Jewish history. An attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardized and up-to-date resource for all articles related to Jewish history.

If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, also consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Jewish history articles.


Yours truly,--Ludvikus 01:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 3 more titles

I'll get to the rest of the 3 later! Ludvikus 20:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Friends of New Germany

I suspect that this Nazi organization was behind this entity - but I cannot find conclusive evidence for it. I've examined the ORIGINAL text of 1934. It has one clear indication that it was NOT a final AMERICAN product - the "INDEX," which is clearly a Table of Contents, is placed in the BACK of the book as un-numbered page 300, the LAST PAGE. In subsequent reprints of this text, not only was the slogan altered, from "UNITED WE FALL, DIVIDED WE STAND," the so-called "INDEX" has been placed as un-numbered page 3 (immediately after Title page 1). It is Europeans who would not place a Table of Contents up front, but in the back. And in particular, I believe that the German have this book-publishing custom. Ludvikus 14:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Who Did It?

I wonder who, in 1934, in Chicago, compiles, published, and distributed the version of THE PROTOCOLS? xyz

[edit] THE PATRIOTIC PUBLISHING CO.

It is not known whether this entity is the SAME as that which published the other cited works!!!

Accordingly--the title, all capital letters--should remain (until, or unless, it is established that it is the same as that entity which published other works besides "The Protocols)."
Yours truly,

[edit] [[{{weasel}}]]

The neutrality or factuality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words.
You can help Wikipedia by improving weasel-worded statements
.
It is not clear who claims this artcle falls under this category. Accordingly, I have removed this TAG from the Article today. Yours truly,--Ludvikus 02:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)