Talk:The Muppets at Walt Disney World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article upgrading needed: You can help. WP:IA 

 Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions

To contribute in upgrading this stub article to start class, the following requirements must be met:

  • Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
  • Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
  • Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image; non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible
  • Plot summary
  • Cast section
  • At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, references in popular culture, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
  • Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))

 Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF

Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to start class and this template will be removed automatically.

This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Unknown
This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.

[edit] 2004?

In this article, someone wrote that "the intentions of this special were revealed in 2004," as though it were some kind of dark secret. The merger between Disney and Henson was common knowledge in 1989; it was in all the newspapers. (I can provide a Chicago Tribune article for proof if necessary.) This special was part of the deal; it was well-known at the time (even though that version of the deal eventually fell through). Whoever keeps citing 2004 as the year this information came out doesn't cite any sources. Should this be changed? Can the person who wrote this elaborate? Thanks. -- TOM-H-CRGL3 20:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)