Talk:The Manchurian Candidate (2004 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.

Contents 1 Spoiler? 2 Adjectives? 3 implants 4 Plot Summary

[edit] Spoiler?

"While the plot still centers around a candidate brainwashed with the involvement of his mother and her own political aims, the mechanics of the story and the parties involved are quite different in cases."

should be imo put after the spoiler warning since it gives much of the plot away (clem 17:27, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC))

[edit] Adjectives?

Is it really necessary for the adjectives to be highlighted as links? Do people really not understand what "manipulated" means? --Charles 21:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] implants

Complex electronic implants play at least as large a role as psychological manipulation by MG. This should be brought into the article. Kdammers 10:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Plot Summary

The plot summary is confusing and convoluted, overly referencing the original movie to the point of obfuscation. Could somebody streamling/clarify it? Perhaps give the references to the original movie its own section?--72.200.118.52 04:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Agree I couldn't follow the plot summary at all. --Rodzilla (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Agree Very hard to follow. Such comments should be reserved for a new section, possibly. Tpoore1 02:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)