Talk:The Magic Pudding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
The Magic Pudding is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article needs an infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

"In its original form the book also reflects Lindsay's rather right-wing and racist leanings; modern editions, for example, usually omit the line "you unmitigated Jew", which is used by one character as an insult."

This is clearly in breach of the WP:NPOV policy, but the sentence appears to contain some useful information and the potential for more so I don't want to delete it. Grumpyyoungman01 13:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lindsay's nativism

So I've removed the NPOV header and taken out the note about Lindsay being a racist. I've also chopped the note about the line removal. Lindsay does in fact seem to have been a nationalist and a racist (see Norman Lindsay, and a right-winger even by the standards of the day. And the line is changed in some contemporary editions , (it's gone in the Phillip Pullman edited edition I have, fro example). But given the length of the article as it stands, it seems insane to devote that much space to this one tiny issue. In other words, this is information that seems like it should be in the article, but only if the thing is ever significantly expanded. That's my take, anyway. NoahB 01:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)