Talk:The Longest Possible Story
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, I *never* give up, so I ask you - what is your objection to this article? It is neither wrong nor unimportant, is correctly titled and contains nothing controversial. It cites other accepted articles, and is of relevance to some.
By deleting the article, repeatedly, you seem to be playing God over what is "right" and what is "wrong". This is not possible; if you think so, come talk to me.
The deleted article has reproduced. Perhaps you'd like to delete that too..?
[edit] P.S., Wikipedia has religious bias
Re. "Wikipedia : neutral and unbiased compilation of previously written, verifiable facts." - The Longest Possible Story, meets my side of the contract (contains and refers to "previously written, verifiable facts"), whereas Deletors are not keeping theirs (to maintain a "neutral and unbiased compilation"). What gives?
If you really want to see the results of acting like God while deciding truth, Morning-Ton Crescent should worry you.
(Many, many, apologies to my preferred Mornington Crescent team.)
- 0.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dspart (talk • contribs) 09:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC).
