Talk:The Jesus Papers: Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up in History
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I fixed a spelling error. No content altered.
One would hope that Wikipedia articles dealing with books confine themselves to the straightforward and objective (NPOV) presentation of the book's contents and a bit about the author(s), but it doesn't seem to be the case here. This article is three paragraphs in length, but the second two appear to question the author's motives and cast doubts as to his credibility--they have little if anything to do with the book itself. Even the first paragraph, which appears to be a short abstract of the book's contents, uses the words "conspirational," "pseudohistory" and a misplaced use of the word "alleged"--words which, however unfairly, have a negative connotation.