Talk:The Imaginary Theatre Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] The Imaginary Theatre Association
I have found that The Imaginary Theatre Association is an Independent role playing Association apart from all in house corporate groups. The Imaginary Theatre Association is mostly involved with other role-playing campaigns, and other Role playing platforms forms of the like. By in large, the ITA have collaborated with other independent role playing campaigns mostly based in Ontario, the ITA is linked by on line message forums, and players can travel with their characters in other ITA gaming campaigns and aswell as other events that the ITA are apart of .
Aside to just hosting Role playing game campaigns, The ITA have take part in running main events at conventions like Anime North http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anime_north, Fan Expo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_Expo_Canada, and Peterborough's PHANTASM. As well the ITA have made on line video production shorts called "Game Trailers" hosted on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/theita) and Live Video (http://www.livevideo.com/theita) , and as well they a have helped with non-profit groups - Anime North, in 2005 and 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anime_north
Their off sight web page can be found at www.theita.ca or at http://groups.msn.com/theita.
More on The Imaginary Theatre Association and Wikipedia can be found at with a wikipedia usre called :RCEHOPPE at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rcehoppe
Would anyone care to add? Avhelverson 16:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've transferred most of this content to the article page - this talk page should just be for discussing the article The Imaginary Theatre Association, not for content itself. It doesn't actually matter if it's here too, but this isn't where people should be looking for it. TSP 16:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ah formating - sorry about that, how about this then... " I have found that" - i hope that i am not missing anything - (lol ;) ) 16:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A Safe Place
You could put the article under someone's user page until you are able to demonstrate the subject's notability. If it were under a userpage, it would not be subject to the same rules as articles in the main namespace. Just a thought. -- Ben (talk) 20:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- That would be a better place for it - article talk pages without articles really shouldn't exist... TSP 23:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)