Talk:The Hills Have Eyes 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] The Hills Have Eyes ¿2?
There is a movie called "The hills have eyes 2" by Wes Craven in 1985.
-
- Yes, but technically its "The Hills Have Eyes Part 2" as in the sequel to the original film. This new one isnt a remake of that film, its a new sequel to the 2006 Aja remake. -Lindsey8417 13:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Which is still totally confusing if you ask me, am I right?74.195.3.11 17:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Official" Myspace
I really have my doubts about the link to the myspace. First off, its not even layout that official film myspaces have. And the information is copy and pasted from the wikipedia article. Unless anyone can show some proof that its official, I'm removing the link. -Lindsey8417 08:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] too revealing
I deleted some of the plot, since it revealed to much of the movie. Goldfishsoldier 03:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- The point of a plot section is to tell the plot (which in turn reveals things that happen in the film). I'm going to revert it back, but I'll add a spoiler warning. -Lindsey8417 12:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edits
I copyedited the characters section and reorganized it to make it better-looking. Also made some edits (Stump is a guy). I was wondering: how much detail do we need in this character section? I altered it so that the sections just list general ages (i.e. 'young man') and removed the race info - IMO they're unnecessary. Thoughts? -Elizabennet | talk 05:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rape
Sick and tired of these movies using rape as horror entertainment. The last one was disgusting the way the mutant breast fed. Fucking sick. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.165.185.32 (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Cleanup
The plot section of the article could use some cleanup. It feels very informal and not very professional. Also, the article could probably use a few citations--as an example, there's a comment in there that says "It's an anti-war film" under plot. It's uncited, and after reading the article, I didn't understand how it was even remotely an anti-war film. 69.250.67.28 20:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with the comment about the plot section, I have performed some fundamental cleanup myself, fixing the obvious spelling and grammatical errors. I have not seen the film, so it would be better if someone who has would perform a more serious overhaul. Irishnightwish 15:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] why?
shdasd;isadfsahdfasdfFUCK YOU BITCH