From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Forty Days of Musa Dagh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
|
|
|
Article policies
|
|
The Forty Days of Musa Dagh is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to better improve and organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
|
[edit] Comments
[edit] Comment
Source for details on the novel's reception: bautz.de/bbkl/w/werfel.shtml (de)
This page delves upon the incident rather than the novel itself which is fictional. We should move most of the information about the event to the Musa Dagh page. Also, the witness in this page who remarks that they stayed at the mountain for only 40 days damages his own credibility. The resistance at Musa Dagh lasted for 53 days not 40. Werfel selected 40 days because of its biblical significance. --MarshallBagramyan 03:16, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The book was never banned in Germany
MarshallBagramyan, what's your source for this edit? --tickle me 00:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi Tickle me, its from a TIME Magazine article titled "Armenian Epic" and dated back to Dec. 3 1934, when they were first reviewing the book. Here's an excerpt from the article:
Not all his Turks are smoothly smiling villains nor all his Armenians embattled heroes. More than a stirring tale, a passionate defense of a persecuted minority, The Forty Days of Musa Dagh has implications that make it unwelcome in Germany.*
...
The Forty Days of Musa Dagh is the December choice of the Book-of-the-Month Club.
*Not actually banned by the Hitler Government, it is listed as "undesirable," is sold only surreptitiously.
--MarshallBagramyan 23:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)