Talk:Terik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Terik has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic Groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

[edit] Failed GA

Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —BorgHunter ^ubx (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. Worldtraveller 16:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. Worldtraveller 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I just started thinking that GA and these kind of articles are simply incompatible (there isn't much to expand when you've pretty much exhausted all published sources). — mark ✎ 16:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

They're exactly the kind of article I had in mind when I started the GA page! Short but comprehensive and excellent encyclopaedic content. Worldtraveller 16:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)