User talk:Tekleni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user talk page has been protected from editing by new or unregistered users to prevent Tekleni (talkcontribsblock logauto suspected socks) from introducing vandalism to it. (Administrators, please remember to add the user to Wikipedia:List of protected pages#Protected user pages.)

This user has moved on. He is not here.
Archive
Archives
  1. 15 September 2006 – 11 October 2006
  2. 11 October 2006 – 31 October 2006
  3. 31 October 2006 – 11 November 2006

Contents

Re: BHRM

Everything shall be included, if that's what others want... Also, see my comment in Template talk:Turkic-speaking. Δεν υπάρχει περίπτωση να είμαι "πολιτικά ορθός"... Ξαφνικά ζητάνε 'Βουλγάρικη μειονότητα'... Μετά την "Μακεδονική", Τουρκική, Ρουμανική, Αλβανική, Roma, κτλ... Ίσως να μιλήσουν και για Σερβική, Γκαγκαουζική (the laters were considered Greeks by the Turks, and now they claim them as "Orthodox Turks", huh?!), Αραβική ή μειονότητα των Elves... I will do the same, if they insist... and be sure that i can source it... What they give, is what they get... Full stop! Hectorian 03:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

TRNC

In my opinion, that's ok. E104421 17:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Alright. Cheers E104421

Sockpuppets?

If, as you claimed, User:Craig Thomasian and User:Hamparzoum are both sockpuppets, then why did Craig Thomasian actually notify Hamparzoum about the Armenia poll (User talk:Hamparzoum)? I think it's clear that Craig Thomasian is a real user. Walton monarchist89 10:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

thank you

thank you for the transl. --VKokielov 02:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Hello, Tekleni, this is just a reminder that your comments are appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Transnistrian referendum, 2006. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Cooperation board launched

A new (and overdue) Greek and Turkish cooperation and notification board has been launched here. Stop by, have a look and sound off! Cheers! Baristarim 07:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Location Maps

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb 2007 20:38 (UTC)