Techno-progressivism

Techno-progressivism, technoprogressivism, or tech-progressivism (a portmanteau word combining "technoscience-focused" and "progressivism") is a stance of active support for the convergence of technological change and social progress. Strong yet critical techno-progressive positions include support for the cognitive liberty, morphological freedom, and reproductive rights in particular. Techno-progressives argue that technological developments can be profoundly empowering and emancipatory when they are regulated by legitimate democratic and accountable authorities to ensure that their costs, risks and benefits are all fairly shared by the actual stakeholders to those developments.^[1]^[2]

Techno-progressivism maintains that accounts of "progress" should focus on scientific and technical dimensions, as well as ethical and social ones. For most techno-progressive perspectives, then, the growth of scientific knowledge or the accumulation of technological powers will not represent the achievement of proper progress unless and until it is accompanied by a just distribution of the costs, risks, and benefits of these new knowledges and capacities. At the same time, for most techno-progressive critics and advocates, the achievement of better democracy, greater fairness, less violence, and a wider rights culture are all desirable, but inadequate in themselves to confront the quandaries of contemporary technological societies unless and until they are accompanied by progress in science and technology to support and implement these values.^[2]

1 Contrasting stance
2 List of notable techno-progressive advocates and cultural critics
3 Techno-progressive subjects of interest
4 References
5 External links

[edit] Contrasting stance

Bioconservatism (a portmanteau word combining "biology" and "conservatism") is a stance of hesitancy about technological development especially if it is perceived to threaten a given social order. Strong bioconservative positions include opposition to genetic modification of food crops, the cloning and genetic engineering of farm and companion animals, and, most prominently, rejection of the genetic, prosthetic, and cognitive modification of human beings to overcome what are broadly perceived as current human and cultural limitations.^[1]^[2]

Bioconservatives range in political perspective from right-leaning religious and cultural conservatives to left-leaning environmentalists and technology critics. What unifies bioconservatives is skepticism about medical and other biotechnological transformations of the living world. Typically less sweeping as a critique of technological society than bioluddism, the bioconservative perspective is characterized by its defense of the natural, deployed as a moral category.^[1]^[2]

Although techno-progressivism is the stance which contrasts with bioconservatism in the biopolitical spectrum, both techno-progressivism and bioconservatism, in their more moderate expressions, share an opposition to unsafe, unfair, undemocratic forms of technological development, and both recognize that such developmental modes can facilitate unacceptable recklessness and exploitation, exacerbate injustice and incubate dangerous social discontent.^[1]

[edit] List of notable techno-progressive advocates and cultural critics

Rhetorician Dale Carrico with his accounts of techno-progressivism^[2]
Philosopher Donna Haraway with her accounts of cyborg theory^[3]
Cultural critic Mark Dery and his accounts of cyberculture^[4]
Bioethicist James Hughes with his accounts of democratic transhumanism^[5]
Science journalist Chris Mooney with his account of the U.S. Republican Party's war on science^[6]
Science journalist Annalee Newitz with her accounts of the biopunk movement^[7]^[8]
Futurist Bruce Sterling with his Viridian design movement^[9]
Futurist Alex Steffen and his Worldchanging blog^[10]

[edit] Techno-progressive subjects of interest

[edit] References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Carrico, Dale (2004). "The Trouble with "Transhumanism": Part Two". Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Carrico, Dale (2005). "Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia". Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
^ Haraway, Donna (1991). "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century". Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
^ Dery, Mark (1994). Flame Wars: The Discourse of Cyberculture. Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-1540-8.
^ Hughes, James (2004). Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-4198-1.
^ Mooney, Chris (2005). The Republican War on Science. Basic Books. ISBN 0465046762.
^ Newitz, Annalee (2001). "Biopunk". Retrieved on 2007-01-26.
^ Newitz, Annalee (2002). "Genome Liberation". Retrieved on 2007-01-26.
^ Sterling, Bruce (2001). "Viridian: The Manifesto of January 3, 2000". Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
^ Steffen, Alex (2006). Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century. Harry N. Abrams, Inc.. ISBN 0810930951.

[edit] External links

Find more information on Techno-progressivism by searching Wikipedia's sister projects
	Dictionary definitions from Wiktionary
	Textbooks from Wikibooks
	Quotations from Wikiquote
	Source texts from Wikisource
	Images and media from Commons
	News stories from Wikinews
	Learning resources from Wikiversity