Talk:Tecnam P92

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.	Aviation Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related WikiProjects and/or task forces: Aircraft WikiProject

[edit] Article name

The name of the article is currently "Tecnam P 92". The article repetitively refers to the P-92. Tecnam themselves refer to the aircraft as the "P92". Renaming. Paul Beardsell 10:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] design weight

"MTO design weight 1320 lbs." No. This is the USA legal weight for SLA. The design weight is something else. But what? MTOW is 1212 lb in the UK. Paul Beardsell 10:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] series vs model

Article asserts P92 is a series of related models from Tecnam. This is not my impression and is not how Tecnam itself sees it, as you can tell from their own web site. The P92 is but one of a series of similar aircraft but this family is not referred to as the P92. It's as if you referred to the Cessna 152, 172, and 182 all under one model name. Incorrect. Paul Beardsell 11:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

---

You should be aware that I copy, pasted the specifications from the tecnam website.And all specifications are for the SUPER ECHO model. But otherwise you have good points on other things. I will correct them immediatly C Mercieca 05:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Which web site? The US distributor's or the Italian manufacturer's? Whichever, should be provided as reference in the article. Paul Beardsell 08:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)