User talk:Tariqabjotu/Archive Fourteen

Main	Gallery	Milestones	Barnstars	Links	Final Words	Talk

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archbishop item

See CNN and BBC News, which mention him admitting it. -- tariqabjotu 06:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Is this in the article yet ? If so, please revert my edit on ITN. I'm working on shortening DYK at the moment. Thanks. --PFHLai 06:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The only admission of anything I could find in the article was about his signing a cooperation statement with the secret police in 1978. It's not clear to me if he has admitted to anything else the newspapers have reported. If that's good enough for you as the same as "admitting he worked with Poland's Służba Bezpieczeństwa ...", okay, I trust your judgement. --PFHLai 07:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

common images

I know the process, but forgot to copy the rest of the image info because I was in a hurry. I thought I'd gotten it because I was looking at the commons version of the image in another browser window. Thanks for fixing it. Savidan 20:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

It wasn't the image info that was the problem; it was that the image was not uploaded locally in the place of the image taken directly from Commons. -- tariqabjotu 20:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Won't happen again. Savidan 20:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Mark Lund

Okay, thanks for letting me know. Nishkid64 21:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Rush Limbaugh protection

Hi Tariqabjotu. Just wondering. Why did you fully protect Rush Limbaugh? I didnt know anyone had requested it, and all things considered, the recent editing (last day or so) is a little less contentious than usual. Not that I mind. I could use a few days off from having to defend it from vandals, but I am curious. Caper13 21:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

No one has to specifically request that a page be protected. I was in reality looking at a request for unprotection, and simply rejected it in favor of full protection upon looking at the history. -- tariqabjotu 22:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the explanation. It seemed like it came out of the blue. Caper13 22:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The editing dispute you referenced on WP:RFP is a revert war involving the addition of a 5-word sentence-- protection is an overreaction. As Caper13 said, things are a bit less contentious than usual, and while he may appreciate the protection to take a 'few days off,' I, for one, would like to continue to try to improve it. (He can rest assured knowing that I'll protect it from vandals! :-) I've consequently relisted it for unprotection or a return to semi-protection. Though you should know. 72.128.82.88 04:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I somehow got logged out. The preceeding was written by GertrudeTheTramp 04:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for giving Infinity on High Protection but there is one problem

The current information on the page is false and was put there by a IP spammer right before you protected the page. Is there a way that you can put the proper information in and then reprotect it. The proper information is provided in the Talk page for the article. Thanks a lot. --Russ is the sex 22:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

If you have a source for your suggestion, I'd consider it. However, consider posting your request to the talk page of the article with {{editprotected}}. -- tariqabjotu 22:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I gave three sources on the talk page. But I will restate my post on your talk page. The proper tracklisting should read as follows:

1. "Thriller"
2. "The Take Over, The Breaks Over"
3. "This Ain't a Scene, It's an Arms Race" - 3:32
4. "I'm Like a Lawyer with the Way I'm Always Trying to Get You Off (Me & You)"
5. "Hum Hallelujah"
6. "Golden"
7. "Thnks fr th Mmrs"
8. "The (After) Life of the Party"
9. "The Carpal Tunnel of Love" - 3:23
10. "Bang the Doldrums"
11. "Fame < Infamy"
12. "You're Crashing, but You're No Wave"
13. "I've Got All This Ringing in my Ears and One on my Fingers"

Confirmed at [1][2][3] Someone should fix it, because the information on the page is currently false. --Russ is the sex 02:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I made the requested change. -- tariqabjotu 02:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

{{USRepSuccessionBox}}

This template has never been vandalized, and has been undergoing edits and improvements. Please do not pre-emptively full-protect pages; it infringes on the fundamental free editing nature of Wikipedia. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

It's used on over two thousand pages and with the recent template vandalism (perhaps you have not heard about it?), pre-emptively protecting a rarely-edited, high-use template, despite no history of vandalism, is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. You can request an edit using {{editprotected}} or, if you feel compelled, take the issue to WP:RPP. -- tariqabjotu 05:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Why not just semi-protect in these circumstances? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 06:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December 16, 2005

Could you comment at this AFD for all individual date pages? I suggested portalifying all of them to Portal:Current events, which may be a bad idea. IIRC you know much more than me about Portal:Current events, so could you take a look and suggest a course of action? Thank you, Kusma (討論) 14:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Discussion is moving, currently some is at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FDecember_16.2C_2005 (and the AFD has been speedily closed). Kusma (討論) 15:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Selective warning

Please don't make selective warnings to one side of the dispute. I know the rules, but thanks for reminding me. --Mardavich 16:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I was going to say the same thing as Mardavich above actually :) I know the rules, but thanks for reminding me. I also know what 3RR is, and none of my edits were disruptive. I left notes on the talk page as well. But again, thanks for reminding me the rules. Cheers! Baristarim 16:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Response

I accept what you are saying, but I think that Persian nationalism is preventing the legitimate inclusion of the commonly accepted alternative name for the Gulf - the Arabian Gulf - in the Persian Gulf article (in fact, in some Arab states it is illegal to refer to the Gulf as the Persian Gulf). Please take a look at the talk page.

Also, after stating my point on Talk:Persian Gulf, User:Mardavich and User:Behaafarid appeared to track back on all my recent contributions - namely to Ethnic minorities in Iran and Arvand Free Zone - and reverted any changes I made, including updated wikilinks, fact tags and NPOV adjustments (nothing substantial, just small edits here and there). It is notable that they have not ever edited these article before, so the only reason for reverting was to stalk and vandalise my work. This is disruptive, but is the common experience Wikipedia users have when confronted by nationalists.--الأهواز | Hamid | Ahwaz 16:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

That attitude does not help one bit. Stop the excessive reverting and stop throwing accusations of nationalism. Your above statement embodies exactly why the Persian Gulf article has faced numerous issues. -- tariqabjotu 16:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

So it's my fault? I bring it on myself? I asked you to look at the constant reversion of my edits by stalkers and you claim I am throwing around accusations. Yes, I am accusing and with good reason.--الأهواز | Hamid | Ahwaz 16:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Unprotect

Hi, can you tell me whether I filed the request on Anti-Zionism wrong, or was it an inappropriate request? I'm not very familiar with the procedure. Thanks, Mackan79 16:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

No, you filed the request correctly. I just rejected it; see the rationale I added to the WP:RPP request. -- tariqabjotu 17:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. It looks like just Chussid against the group to me (though I they were clearly revert warring as well), so I don't see the point in blocking the entire page. In any case, I was just curious for a second opinion. Thanks, Mackan79 17:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Rush Limbaugh

Yep, sorry, just forgot! --Robdurbar 19:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Arabian/Persian Gulf

Thank you Tariq for not protecting that page. Please take the time to read this: [4]. Jidan 19:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Unjustified Warning/Accusation

I not provoking anyone, I am simply discussing content and citing Wikipedia policies, which is entirely within my rights as a user, and user:Ahwaz responds by saying "you are a liar, as well as a stalker and a bully" [5] or that "I can't read English" [6] and you come and warn me? You're an administrator, you should know the WP:NPA policy better than me. Are such comments acceptable to you? If not, then why isn't user:Ahwaz being warned? --Mardavich 23:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

No, I do not believe Ahwaz's comments are acceptable. And yes, I am familiar with WP:NPA, which in part says Frequently, the best way to respond to an isolated personal attack is not to respond at all. I understand it's not just a lone personal attack, but the guy is blocked... there isn't much harm he can do since his talk page is the only place he can post comments. If you stop posting on his talk page, it is very likely he will stop responding. It's as if you're sticking your hand into a lion's cage; you keep doing it even though you know you'll get bitten and even though you can just leave it alone. -- tariqabjotu 23:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I had given up already. But my intention was never to provoke him, but rather to open up some sort of dialogue with him and explain to him the reliable sources policy (WP:RS), since I saw him complaining that nobody is interested in a debate or discussion with him. Unfortunately, he doesn't want to assume good faith and he's only interested in personal accusations and attacks, which is why I gave up a few hours ago. Anyways, your intentions seem noble, sorry for my earlier reaction, I am just touchy and tired because of all that verbal abuse. --Mardavich 00:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

People born in Jerusalem

Hi,

I've noticed you was the editor who added the split request to the Jerusalem article. Was that list moved to somewhere or was it simply deleted by the anonymous user who edited it at 17:24, 9 January 2007? I noticed this quite accidentally (I was searching for that section of the article in the page history because I need the template that arranged the list into nice columns), and now I don't know whether I stumbled upon unnoticed vandalism or the list is safely moved to somewhere. – Alensha ^talk 15:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm not sure what happened to it either. I saw the list had suddenly disappeared, but not moved to another article. I just didn't say anything about it because I didn't think it was necessary for the article anyway and surmised that someone else had agreed with me on that point. -- tariqabjotu 15:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't know whether it's important for the article or not but lots of cities have similar sections and apparently it was important for those who compiled the list (and how would it look if that anonymous someone's edit was the final say in the matter :) anyway, I'll mention it on the talk page and if someone cares, they can move it wherever they want. – Alensha ^talk 16:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

IPs on WP:AIV

For future reference, when reporting IP addresses on WP:AIV, use the {{ipvandal}} template instead, since it has important WHOIS links. For instance, in the past half-hour I saw that two reported IP vandals came from the BBC (not blocked) and the U.S. House of Representatives (blocked) due to the WHOIS links. -- tariqabjotu 22:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm using VandalProof to automatically report the IPs. Any idea on how to change the template in VP? Corpx 22:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

It has already been suggested on the VP's reqest feature page. Corpx 22:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

There probably is a way already, but I'm not familiar enough with the program to know. You should get your answer anyway. -- tariqabjotu 22:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:ADOPT

Hi there,

Looking through our Archives I saw that you took an interest in the Adopt-a-user program during its formation and development. Well this is just a quick message to tell you the program is well and truly lifted off, with over 200 users involved in the program, 50+ active Adopters and approx. 150 Adoptees, and always expanding. If your still interested please pop by WP:ADOPT, have a look around and ask any questions you want on our talk page. Look forward to seeing you there. Cheers Lethaniol 15:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Banned User Returns

HKelkar is back in a different username Rumpelstiltskin223 and as is usual is being accorded the same leeway on Wikipedia by the mainly Indian Admins.87.74.29.232 01:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I find some similarities between the two accounts, but a request for checkuser reveals that it is unlikely they're maintained by the same person. Regardless, please do not levy attacks against Indian people; those kinds of comments do not lend to civil discussion. -- tariqabjotu 01:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Understandable,If you think this was a bad choice of words, apologies.But as we are well aware HKelkar has been a very difficult sockpupeteer, and has been fooling around and hiding behind technology.It is very likely, he is using a proxy or a home internet connection this time.Can we tag this account as a suspect 87.74.29.232 09:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Jerusalem

Jerusalem Hello Tariqabjotu

Please look more carefully, it was my work on Jerusalem that has been reverted by User:Amoruso and User:Okedem simply because of their blatant POV, you can check where they come from.

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Ararat Arev

Well, since my AN/I post, he's edited under two more IP addresses (both blocked now) and keeps stalking me about changing the article. Nishkid64 01:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, another IP I blocked. Nishkid64 01:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay; I'm officially retracting that comment on WP:ANI; a week is perfectly fine, and a further extension could soon be in order if he doesn't stop. -- tariqabjotu 01:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Your name

Nice name, Tariq means a star Tariqa is the feminine version of the name bjotu what does that mean? Was just curious ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 10:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Bombing of Guernica

Please don't forget to unprotect. The turmoil seems to have settled down and the tag craps up the page. Haber 04:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I removed the move protection. -- tariqabjotu 05:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Storm Kyrill

Sorry if I sounded direct with you, but it did strike me as quite Ameri-centric that an event effecting nearly all of Europe had been left out of the important news. I am also American though I am currently living in Germany, and in all honesty I had never heard of a European windstorm until I experienced a few here. While we do have international news, it only occurs insofar as it is important to us, and this event was not. At any rate, I respect your choice to add it even though I might not have been completely pleasant at the time. P.S. - I like your photos from D.C.: that's where I grew up! Djlayton4 14:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:ITN reversion

I don't think your reversion is correct. Reports most certainly should be in present tense (and it is), but I don't believe the same is true for conducts. Read the sentence in question and you'll see what I'm talking about. Or, compare it with the equally confusing sentence...

A scientist reports that the universe begins a long time ago

-- tariqabjotu 22:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

You're correct, of course; I misread the sentence. My apologies. —David Levy 22:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Your semiprotection

I checked to see what was going on the Colts page, lol I found this. That was hilarious! Arjun 05:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks; I'm glad I gave someone a laugh. -- tariqabjotu 05:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

You succeeded very well :). Arjun 05:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

p.s I like the template at the top of your page displaying all of the various major world religion symbols. I find it very interesting and very refreshing. Arjun 05:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

CfD renaming

Hi Tariq,

I was hoping you could again assist in carrying out the moves listed here and here. Tedious, but thats what the mop is for {{subst:Smiley|03}}. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 03:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps we can also rename Category:Aviation in Palestine, Category:Airlines of Palestine, Category:Sport in Palestine which I missed on the CfD, as well as Category:Elections in Palestine to match its article, Elections in the Palestinian National Authority (which I think found support on the original CfD). Thanks, Tewfik^Talk 18:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Could you let me know one way or the other on this? Tewfik^Talk 17:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

When I originally looked at the CfD page, I saw that the items had already been completed. For the additional ones you mentioned, I would suggest doing a CfD deletion discussion. A bot takes care of much of the category-moving stuff after the discussion is completed. -- tariqabjotu 20:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I didn't realise that a bot took care of these actions. As for renaming the others, I feel that the previous discussions and agreement between myself, Palmiro, and others is sufficient precedent (Aviation, Airlines, and Sport all fit the CfD exactly, while "Elections" found support from Palmiro on the original bloc CfD, and in any event should match its article's name). That, and I don't particularly want to go through the another multi-week CfD complete with drive-by voting, trolling, etc. Let me know either way. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 22:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to do it; I see a couple of the articles have gone through CfDs in past, most notably Category:Elections in Palestine and Category:Sport in Palestine. -- tariqabjotu 22:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I linked to that CfD here. It failed because it was a bloc nomination (with confused voting), but the closing admin requested relisting separately, which I then did and in which there was then agreement with users from different sides of the spectrum. I neglected to include the first three, though it seems that they would follow the precedent. The "elections" has not had that precedent established per se, but received Palmiro's support on the original bloc CfD in addition to having a main article with a different name - I'm not trying to 'pull a fast one' on you here. Thanks in any event though. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 23:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

BOT - Regarding your recent protection of Indian Standard Time:

You recently protected[7] this page but did not give a protection summary. If this is an actual (not deleted) article, talk, or project page, make sure that it is listed on WP:PP. VoABot will automatically list such protected pages only if there is a summary. Do not remove this notice until a day or so, otherwise it may get reposted. Thanks. VoABot 05:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Unlock Plutarch template

Hey, I see that the Plutarch template has been locked... could you unlock it? I need to make a change to it... as the Dion, tyrant of Syracuse wikilink is now a redirect. Needs to be fixed.-BiancaOfHell 05:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Damn you

I was just about to uncascade that protection too. :P Viridae^Talk 04:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually

I was just trying to find out how cascading protection worked and I figured why not my own userspace. I guess I broke a few things :o -- Tawker 05:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Template:Football in England table cells

FYI, I've removed your cascading protection on Template:Football in England table cells. Seems no longer needed. [8], [9]. --Ligulem 13:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm quite happy for the new expiration feature that will allow me to just set a 24-hour expiration on templates transcluded into today's featured articles. That wasn't around at that time though. -- tariqabjotu 15:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I was just a bit puzzled what to do with the cascading protection left on that template (the template itself had cascade protection set). I'm still not yet 100% sure I've understood all the new nifty protection features in all their glory.... :-). Does a cascade protection expire as well? I need to do some research.... --Ligulem 16:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow. Yeah. The cascade protection expires as well. Everything fine. Sorry for disturbing :-) --Ligulem 17:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Please re-protect the article

Please re-protect the article Religious significance of Jerusalem. Talks are underway. Infact we have plans to fiel a mediation. We were jsut waiting for users fro the Rfc I posted. Unprotecting may create another edit-war.Bless sins

If edit-warring returns, the article can be re-protected or the offending parties warned / blocked for violating the three-revert rule. -- tariqabjotu 23:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Politics of Khuzestan

There is an attempt by two political editors to remove entire sections from this article without comment.[10] [11] [12] The edit war is accompanied by various offensive accusations against me and another editor: Nazi, anti-Iranian, insane, promoters of genocide, separatist, racist, Baathist, Saddam supporter, propagandist: [13] [14] [15] If there is to be any solutions to the editorial disputes on this article and other articles related to Al-Ahwaz (Khuzestan), there need to be great admin attention. I have filed a request for comment, but I can see from previous requests that little is done.[16] I have also agreed to mediation [17], but this offer was turned down by another editor in dispute.[18]--الأهواز | Hamid | Ahwaz 18:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Khaybar

Could you look at this edit by an otherwise disruptive new editor? I have no idea of the facts, but it seems wrong. Agathoclea 09:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I can't help you out either; I don't know myself whether it's correct or not. -- tariqabjotu 18:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Jerusalem RfC

My comment had nothing to do with the previous one... I checked the articles on several other capital cities, and they all start with "CITY NAME is the capital of COUNTRY NAME". No need to change this format for Jerusalem. I have clarified my comment on the talk page. Blueboar 18:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

ATHF/Devices

Can you add a Wiki link toward the top so people kind find them easier? I added that Wiki link at the top (was going to take it down later this evening). - SVRTVDude 22:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it's necessary; there's a link in the table of contents. -- tariqabjotu 22:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

It maybe, cause some people are lazy and don't want to scroll for a link and since this is a current event (continuing to break), it should be put up at the top til, let's say 9pm EST. - SVRTVDude 22:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Protection necessary?

Is it really necessary to protect Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace purely because it will be Today's Featured Article tomorrow? Or did I miss the memo saying that it was standard procedure to protect an article that will be Today's Featured Article? The Filmaker 23:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

The article has only been move-protected so that no one can move the article. There is absolutely no need for an article to be moved during the twenty-four hours it is featured at Today's Featured Article. I've been move-protecting the featured article for several weeks now, but note what happened when I forgot to move-protect one. -- tariqabjotu 23:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I miss construed. My bad. The Filmaker 23:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Disputed ITN item

Actually, Blnguyen was apparently referring to the {{totallydisputed}} template on the article. -- tariqabjotu 02:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Yep, I was just self-reverting. —David Levy 02:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Askari reaction.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Askari reaction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Chicago Bears

Was there really a point to removing the {{sprotected}} tag from the Chicago Bears article? The article will likely be renominated for protection regardless of the outcome of Super Bowl XLI (Roughly before the game's 4th quarter) ;-) -- ShadowJester07  ►Talk  03:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. -- tariqabjotu 03:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Anthony cfc at simple.wikipedia

Good evening; we've not met before, so first off I'm very pleased to meet you. Secondly, I'd like to request your blessing at the above page - I've used your infobox (I'm calling it a glance box) on my userpage at simple.wikipedia (I've attributed it at User:Anthony cfc/Glance Box) and I don't want to continue using it if it's not to your preference.

Awaiting your response,
Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 23:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

No, I don't mind. -- tariqabjotu 16:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

ITN

I realized that as soon as I had hit "save page". Actually, since today's featured article is so short, I'd be OK with removing another item from ITN (probably Guinea), but I suppose that the long DYK helps balance the page. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello

I noticed you unblocked mardavich when the other admin blocked him, im surprised the other admin didn't even warn adil he has locked several pages with his edit warring, some of them also use anons to revert, another cause of edit warring, please see this article Qazakh i clarified who the historian was he reverted it and atabek, one of many new supporters and rising unusually supporters of adil, Aivazovsky already reverted adil when the material was referenced please look into this, and the conflicts mostly are Armenian and Azeri articles and get the Neutral perspective mostly from users like us not atabek no offense to them. Nareklm 23:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Weather

Hi Tariqabjotu,
I seen what you were trying to do over at {{Infobox Weather}} a little while ago and why you didn't use it at Jerusalem's article. I thought that I would let you know that I have been planning to revamp that Infobox in the future with changes such as making the year column optional and automatic unit conversion. When I get it done I'll let you know a place it on the Jerusalem page. —MJCdetroit 04:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, the template is in some serious need of organization, but I just do not have the time at the moment. I didn't have yearly averages available and was trying to make that column optional. However, I had trouble doing that, and since I wanted to change the font sizes, lighten the color for the high temperature, add line breaks, among other things, I decided to just make my own version of the template (the differences between the codes for the template and the Jerusalem version are quite noticeable). -- tariqabjotu 04:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Discussion moved to MJCdetroit's talk page.14:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)