User talk:Tarc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi Tarc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.
Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.
Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 18:31, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Hezbollah
"In a non-binding resolution adopted by the European Parliament on 10 March 2005, The EU Parliament considered that clear evidence exists of terrorist activities by Hezbollah and recommended that 'The EU Council should take all necessary steps to curtail them'. MEPs urged the EU Council to brand Hezbollah a terrorist organization. However, the Council is reluctant to do so, as France, Spain, and Britain fear that such a move would further damage the prospects for Middle East peace talks.[16]"
So, they haven't officially branded Hezbollah as an organization yet, but, at the same time, a non-binding resolution recognizes Hezbollah as one (see Hezbollah article) WhisperToMe 17:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Chiming in
Ah, well, thanks - it's good to have a registered users confimation sometimes. —Xyrael / 06:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sayyid
Syed is actually the most common spelling, but the editors of that article contend that "Sayyid" is the spelling most often used in academic texts, so I doubt a change would go undisputed. BhaiSaab talk 05:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Israel and the UN
Being subject to some considerable buffing and POV pushing - can you have a look please?
86.27.55.184 13:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please see talk page - don't revert
also are you suggesting we merge God and redirect allah to God ? Zeq 21:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summary
RE: this edit.
- It doesn't appear to me that this user's (189.162.8.77 (talk • contribs)) contributions to TV Land were in any way bad-faith or intentionally disruptive. Asserting that you were reverting "vandalism" is disingenuous and does not accurately explain why you reverted those edits. If you didn't believe those changes were helpful, explain why. Thanks, Scientizzle 19:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me. I have responded here. -- Scientizzle 23:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Embargo
Mad because I reverted your edits on the Nasrallah article? Do not provoke me. I blanked my own talk page because the block was expired. Go find another Arab to harass. Embargo 19:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation of Inayat Bunglawala conflict
Hey, I've been trying to mediate at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-02-19 Inayat Bunglawala. Zeq is getting pretty irate and hysterical, however, because I don't agree with him. Have a look. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 08:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Zeq's collusion
The three revert rule implies that, even if one hasn't reverted three times in 24 hours, the user may still be blocked:
- The rule does not convey an entitlement to revert three times each day, nor does it endorse reverting as an editing technique; rather, the rule is an "electric fence".[1] Editors may still be blocked even if they haven't made more than three edits in any given 24 hour period, if their behaviour is clearly disruptive. — WP:3RR
So if one is clearly abusing the 3RR or "gaming the system", as it were, then that user can still be blocked (at an admin's discretion). − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 18:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed compromise
A compromise has been proposed. It is toned down to simply state that the allegation was made, and that the allegation was denied. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 20:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stevegrogan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stevegrogan.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination as a good article
Salam. I think Hezbollah has reached to good article criteria and I want to nominate it. Please write your idea in talk:Hezbollah#Good article nomination--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 06:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Millennium (TV series)
Regarding your comment, the image was not deleted. It was moved down the page to eliminate whitespace. Dustbunniesmultiply 07:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Assume good faith
My understanding was that this is what was agreed. If you undersod differently let's re-open the mediation or maybe you can point out to me where I agreed to what you claim I did.
always assume good faith . Please appologize for calling me a liar. Zeq 18:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Racism by Country
Thanks for offering feedback from the RfC (I assume that's how you got there). WilyD 14:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
