Talk:Taoist Tai Chi Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Critcism

This article seems to recite the Taoist Tai Chi Society's claims without any rebuttal or criticism, which is odd considering the low esteem with which it is generally held in the martial arts community. (RookZERO 05:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC))

The aim is to make the article align with a NPOV, not to present any possible criticism of the Society. What criticism would you include? the matter of the volunteer nature of instructors has been previously settled, and any critcism of its goals is a personal opinion of the larger goal of Tai Chi that is discussed in the main article. and you cant say that its held in low esteem, there are no surveys to back that up. besides, the society is about health and helping people not developing martial skill. most internal martial artists of good standing recognise and respect the differing goals and opinion. VanTucky 05:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I rm'd the NPOV tag. You may think it is not neutral but one key facet from your objection is missing. If you read the npov page, it says specifically that neutrality means representing equally all published points of view. if you can find a reference that criticizes the Taoist Tai Chi Society that is not included, please rv the deletion. VanTucky 05:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)