Talk:Tally-Ho

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.


Flag
Portal
Tally-Ho is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Disambiguation required?

Should the city in Florida really be here? It's "Tally Ho", and the product in question is "Tally-Ho". There's an article on the expression at Tally-ho, which has a redirect from Tally Ho, which is probably where the city should be. I think this may justify a disambiguation page, but I'm not inclined to take that step by myself.

By the way - I'm the author of the linked article on Grouse. I've never been a source before, so I'm even less inclined to step in and rearrange things myself. BremenSaki 07:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


  • In my opinion, it shouldn't. The reference is to a slang name for the city of Tallahassee, and should at most be mentioned in that city's article. I'll wait a day for differences of opinion, then remove it. I have also changed the statement "Tally-Ho appears to also be an Australian brand..." to "Tally-Ho is an Australian brand...". Andoka 03:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Reference to Tallahassee now deleted. If people from there feel it needs a dab I'm sure they will add it.--Grahamec 12:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The aforementioned article is akin to a 'comedy' blog. No real relevence to Tally-Ho Rolling Papers. Unprofessional and biased.

Yes, should be deleted if it can't be improved.--Grahamec 12:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
It's written in a style intended to be entertaining, for sure, but there's nothing in the article that's actually been fabricated. I'll accept "unprofessional", but I'm not sure "biased" is an appropriate label. BremenSaki 06:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)