Talk:Take point

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (general topics): Military science task force Related task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] AfD survived

This article, under its former name of Walk point was proposed for deletion on 24 Oct. 2006. After discussion and a rewrite of the article, the AfD was withdrawn. Bejnar 22:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Someday very soon I'm planning to expand this article significantly...

...and therefore render less significant the popular culture para I just added. If someone else feels strongly about it, delete the para for now, and I'll put it back in when it's more proportionally appropriate. IMHO, sometimes well-sourced folk references are necessary so that Wikipedia helps a reader better understand the language. BusterD 23:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I think how you're handling it makes sense. Like it or not, the reference as it is probably isn't well understood outside of the cultural aspect, but a decent expansion (which I'll be glad to help on when I can find some info) will give the section a more desirable weight. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)