User talk:Tablizer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Data structures
I'm not sure what to think of the statement you added to data structure. To my mind, an abstract data structure describes an interface, while an ordinary data structure, such as a red-black tree, specifies a detailed design (if not the exact implementation). Would you agree with this? If so, maybe the article should say something to this effect. Derrick Coetzee 04:34, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I see the term as covering both. "Abstract data structure" is one kind, but there is no specific/simple term for implementation. -- user: tablizer
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!
Glad you decided to join us. Feel free to put {{user c2}} on your user page, as well as links to your stuff. --EngineerScotty 05:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yep. Howdy, Top. -- Earle Martin [t/c] 21:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Craig Stuntz 13:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RDBMS
No offense, but I removed all the stuff about dynamic relational. It's mostly worthless from the theoretical perspective (the purpose of this article), and it's uncited. WP:BOLD McKay 20:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Milky Way
Tablizer, I thought about providing a brightened, enhanced version myself, but assumed if somebody thought it would be useful they would make one of their own. I'm glad you did. When I have some time I'll make an enhanced version starting with the original RAW file, and we can decide then whether it's worth replacing my original or your edit with the new one.
I noticed the license tags on your version are missing, and took the liberty of tagging it for you. Derivatives of my original should be licensed according to the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 guidelines. If you have any questions or concerns about this please feel free to discuss it with me.
Thanks -- moondigger 02:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Nomination: Collection Oriented Programming
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Collection Oriented Programming meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collection Oriented Programming. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. --Craig Stuntz 13:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sea Star Answer
I saw you asked a question about the sea star's defense. It actually, doesn't really have one. Luckily though, it has the ability to grow back its arms, but if the central area is destroyed, the sea star will unfortunately die. Brittle Stars, however, have a defense mechanism. They release one of their arms to distract the predators, while they getaway. They too can grow back arms. Hope that helps, it's very interesting! Shy1520 04:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Archimedes Heat Ray.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Archimedes Heat Ray.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 21:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
