Talk:Tărtăria tablets

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

...currently in an unidentified private collection? Wetman 22:37, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)~

[edit] Tartaria tablets

I made some research on reading these Tartaria tablets.Absolutely all elementary signs on them can be found among different ancient alphabets.I wonder how so few realised this.I do not understand why highly specialised schollars got near zero output on this matter.These tablets were written using : the round-one mostly old-canaanite and phoenician letters;and the squared-one,anatolian alphabets (in principal lycian). It is showing a clear phase when writing systems were not stabilised,or not finished. You can see my work at: TARTARIA WRITTEN NEOLITHIC TABLETS,DECIPHERMENT ATTEMPT(On Romanian territory),4.500 B.C.(?) Please undrstand that from all possible readings I choosed the lycian/hittite/akkadian renderigs. 1.The round tablet decipherment at: http://oldeuropeanwritingtartaria.blogspot.com/ 2.The squared tablet is on: http://oldeuropewriting.blogspot.com (PART 1) 3. " " http://oldeuropeanwritingtartariasqpart2.blogspot.com (PART 2) 4.Only complete Quadrant No.2 of the round tablet: http://tartariatablets.journalscribe.com/ If you have some ideas,or other opinions,please feel free to write me.I am waiting for them with great interest.

     ing. Rau Eugen Timisoara Str.Motilor Nr.3 jud.TIMIS  ROMANIA

tel.+40256495823 eugen_rau@hotmail.com eugen_rau@yahoo.com

Hi Eugen. Newcomers often do as you did above, but Wikipedia talk pages should be for discussing changes to the article or comments intended to affect the content of the article directly, not merely pertaining to the subject matter (for example, on Talk:Cigarette, I shouldn't just talk about cigarettes, but preferably relate it to the article Cigarette directly). Alexander 007 07:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
In fact, your post can be interpreted as spam (by calling it spam, I do not pass judgment on its merits, merely implying that the only purpose of your post seems to be to direct people to your blogs and your research), and I was about to remove it, but I did not want to be rude. Alexander 007 07:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Spam is too harsh a word, I dont think it was deliberate advertisement, more along the lines of original research. HuronKing

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/%C4%83/r/Talk%7ET%C4%83rt%C4%83ria_tablets_daff.html"