User talk:Sword of Christ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Sword of Christ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hut 8.5 16:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article help request

Yes, BUT in this case you should be very careful that your article complies with WP:NPOV and WP:V. All articles have to conform to these policies, but in this case you should be especially careful. Hut 8.5 16:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a soapbox and that we have a policy against original researches. By the way, please refrain from adding nonsense as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanga (Portugal). Thank you. --Húsönd 18:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Userbox removal on User:Hut 8.5

Also very important, please don't do this ever again. Wikipedia is not censored, and in no way it abids by the rules of any religion so you can't just remove another user's userbox that says that he/she is atheist just because you think that's an attack on catholicism. I strongly suggest that you carefully read WP:NOT and WP:POINT before proceeding with your edits on Wikipedia. Thank you.--Húsönd 19:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The law of our lord, oh mighty God is spread accross all the lands he created, therefore any athiest infidels who oppose the spread of Gods will and the ten commandments will be banished to the fires of hell--88.108.203.54 19:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Soz that was me--Sword of Christ 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during November 27, 2006 (UTC) to New antisemitism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Hut 8.5 19:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanga (Portugal)

OK, it is time for your joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both here in the Wikipedia community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism and you could get blocked from editing Wikipedia for it. You might not get another warning before having a block imposed, so be careful and be serious from now on.

Húsönd 19:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated.Húsönd 19:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I am being 100% serious, i believe that there should be a global Catholic state ruled by the Pope and with the ten commandments as its constetution. Two years ago God same to me in a vision and told me that this was my duty, and that only then would i be given access to heaven, God is my guide and Jesus is my idle. If you dissagree with me, please debate with me, but don't just block me for you will find no peace in the fires of hell. --Sword of Christ 19:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Carry on adding this stuff to pages and articles indiscriminately and you will find yourself blocked indefinitely. Hut 8.5 19:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hut 8.5, why are you so incapable to dibate, you do nothing but threat and your actions will be frowned upon by our Almightly God--Sword of Christ 20:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Please don't use your talk page to post these irrelevant comments. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Hut 8.5 20:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

But your not even dibating with me, all you are doing is threatning and repremanding. --Sword of Christ 20:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Precisely! We're here to build an encyclopedia, not discuss religion. Hut 8.5 20:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Shorly that is for God to deside, not humble mortals such as you or I--Sword of Christ 20:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Please listen to Hut 8.5. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia with this nonsense, you will be blocked indef. Please be reasonable and read WP:NOT. Thank you.--Húsönd 00:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I support sword of christ. May god be with you in earth as it is in heaven88.105.208.103 16:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you my friend, and may God be with you, blessed are those who struggle against oppression. I can only hope that Hut 8.5 and Husond change there ways before our lord, oh mighty God, strikes them down. --Sword of Christ 17:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place for you to hold religious discussions. That last comment is close to a personal attack. Hut 8.5 17:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


IF YOU INSULT OUR GOD, THEN YOU CANNOT EXPECT TO GO UNPUNISHED --Sword of Christ 17:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars. --Hut 8.5 17:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Hut 8.5, if you have been possesed by Saten i can help you, just place your trust in the true God!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sword of Christ (talk • contribs).

Please don't post messages on pages that are completely irrelevant to the topic of the page. It can be seen as spam and Wikipedia regards adding spam to articles or talk pages as a form of vandalism. Thank you. --Hut 8.5 17:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during November 30, 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Hut 8.5 17:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense Talk:Islam

Greetings thanks for wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. Please do not misuse Wikipedia by adding inappropriate and non-editorial talk like the talk you left that has since been deleted. Please see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#How to use article talk pages. Thank you. (→Netscott) 17:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked you again for 48 hours, for incivil comments, and POV pushing. This is not the place to push you religeous beliefs are condemn other users under the name of your god. Please consider this when you block expires. If you believe this is unfair you can use the {{unblock|reason}} template. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "You have proven yourself to be truely evil, you may succeed in silencing one voice, but the reverbiration from the world will haunte you for the rest of your life"

Decline reason: "This is not a policy based reason for unblocking. Engaging in further personal attacks on Wikipedia will not help matters. I suggest that during your block you read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy as well as our civility policy. I strongly suggest you return only if you can edit subject to the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. Otherwise, you are simply wasting our time and yours. -- JoshuaZ 17:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
The template above says not to post another unblock request after the first one has been declined. If you can't even do that and have to continue to make personal attacks like calling people "bastards" then there likely isn't a place for you here on this project. Now, please calm down and wait your 48 hours. JoshuaZ 17:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

ok, sorry. I have to go anyway, to pray —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sword of Christ (talk • contribs) 17:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Evangelizing

Evangelists of any persuasion are welcome on Wikipedia. Evangelizing is not. Strive towards Truth on another venue; WP strives towards verifiably accurate, NOT Truth. The reason is simple:

Truth is subjective, not objective.

To a Muslim, Jesus was just another one of God's prophets and Mohammad was his final and greatest prophet; to a Christian Jesus was the only son of God, the redeemer; to an atheist he is a myth that people like to believe in. All of these views represent Truth to those who hold them. If we allow Truth, we open the door to fanatics edit warring madly. And it isn't just religion; it is everything from whether abortion is moral to which musical artist was the greatest in their field to which episode of SouthPark best highlights the political satire the series is known for.

Hence, verifiability and neutral point of view. I can verify and state clearly, with sources, different views from different groups, being careful to not present the views in a biased fashion - see WP:NPOV#Undue weight - and not presume to know Truth, because all I can ever know is my very personal version of the Truth. The same is true for every human - you may agree on some things, but you do not agree on the Truth about everything with any one person.

If you wish to improve articles on your particular sect of Roman Catholicism, I support your efforts. If you continue to edit multiple general articles to conform to your personal belief system, you will not only not have support you will be considered a disruptive POV pusher and even a vandal. If you have questions, if you need help, I am more than happy and available. Do not continue to flout policy and vandalize WP to promote your personal belief system. KillerChihuahua?!? 17:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Just looking at some of this editor's history, it seems extremely unlikely to me that their being serious about anything they've ever said, his actions appear to just be an elaborate joke. I mean, come on, calls someone a...well...I won't write it, and then says "ok, I have to go pray now" and playing up to a probably Seventh Day Adventist straw man representation of Catholicism? Even the most ridiculous of criticisms of Christianity throughout all of literature have more realism in character development of hypocritical sterotype figures than this person, I really think he's just having fun here :/. Homestarmy 18:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree with you there, Homestarmy. Hut 8.5 18:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree, it seems like some cute14U style disruption.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 21:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
It does appear so, although I hope not. I tend to AGF beyond reasonable sometimes, it appears this may be one of those times. KillerChihuahua?!? 21:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Note that his unblock request above looks similar to the deathbed testament of Alexander Litvinenko. Hut 8.5 15:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Yah, SoC's now a well-fed troll. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 00:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Nicely spotted there Hut 8..5 SoC's got true trollality to source one like that. (→Netscott) 07:20, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Pak21 has listed this user as a sockpuppet of Mechanismtongs (see User:Pak21/JediOrder), which does seem plausible given my experience of Mechanismtongs. Hut 8.5 11:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/w/o/User_talk%7ESword_of_Christ_d86a.html"