Talk:Swissair Flight 111

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Swissair Flight 111 has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

Swissair Flight 111 has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Switzerland and Liechtenstein on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.	Aviation Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (comments)

Contents 1 until? 2 Future of the article 3 Good article 4 Boeing?

[edit] until?

The Canadian Transportation Safety Board (TSB) did not release its preliminary report until August 30, 2000 and the final report was delayed until.

Until when?

Any update on the lawsuit?

[edit] Future of the article

I'm hoping to get this article FA-status, and as such am in the process of re-writing/adding/updating it. See:Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Wikipedia:Article development, Wikipedia:The perfect article, User:Trevor MacInnis/Article Creation and Improvement Drive. I have the TSB report, but would like to know about any reputable websites/books with other information. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 07:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Sone things we need:

1. images that are not Non-commercial licenses.
   1. check [1], [2], [3], [4]
2. something about how big the investigation was (for example, I know they invented new ways of investigating, but can't find a reference for that fact,)

[edit] Good article

I've made some minor tweaks but in general I think it's a very good article deserving of the title. Having seen the National Geographic documentary on it, I feel this article provides good and detailed coverage of the accident, without using too much technical terms. BabyNuke 20:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

edit: Note, I've have listed it under "Engineering and technology - Engineering failures and disasters" BabyNuke 20:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boeing?

The article states that the aircraft was a Macdonald Douglass product, so I am wondering why was Boeing involved in the investigation and compensation of victim's families? AbstractClass 02:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)