User talk:Swboarder55
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] One Thrust Theory
The One Thrust Theory is another advancement in modern day Tantric Sex. The One Thrust Theory was created by High School Sexpert, Andrew "Jaime" McCoy. The Theory purposes the idea that if one stores up their sexual energy, it will directly effect the power and height of their orgasms.
[edit] How to Perform It
As its name implies, the method requires the male counterpart to insert his penis into the female's vagina only once. But it is more of a thrust movement rather than the usual insertion. The One Thrust Theory also supports the idea that the male's stored sexual energy can and will directly effect the woman's orgasms. Thusly, the man is required to abstain from sex for an undefined amount of time and is also encourage to think about sex as much as possible to heighten the longing for sex. Once the desired amount of Sexual Energy is reached, he may perform the One Thrust Method. The One Thrust Theory works best in the missionary with the woman on her back and the man either on his feet or his knees. Once properly positioned, achieve erection and approach the opening of the vagina. He may touch the vagina with his penis but absolutely may not penetrate. He is encourage to wait just a few moments longer before to heighten the excitement. Then, with all their combined might, the man thrusts his erect penis into her vagina, immediately blowing all his stored energy. Both the man and woman immediately climax, and do so for some time.
[edit] How it Works
The One Thrust Method works through its most important step, waiting. Abstaining from sex has been proven to store your sexual energy, and heighten your pleasure. The exact amount of time required to wait is different for every person and all depends on how much of a 'sexual being' you are.
[edit] Origin of The One Thrust Theory
The One Thrust Theory was created by Andrew McCoy while talking with a couple of friends Dan Cambell and Zack Green after their seventh period Spanish class. McCoy was discussing his recent sexual frustration of the monotonous normal 'In-and-Out-and-In again' method of intercourse so he created a brand new method. A method that was new and unusual, went against the norm, and heightened the pleasure for both participants. He immediately came up with the One Thrust Theory.
[edit] User talk:Swboarder55
This article is most certainly not patent nonsense. It does provide meaningful insight on the One Thrust Theory that has been proved and performed. It is a relatively unknown subject and Wikipedia should feel honored that it has the first official article on the matter. A speedy deletion is both unneccesary and detrimental to Wiki users. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Swboarder55 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Opposition to the One thrust theory article
Please stop re-creating the One thrust theory article. A brand new theory created by a self-proclaimed sex expert and high school student with no Google hits is going to be notable enough for inclusion as an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability, two guiding principles on inclusion of material in Wikipedia. If you have any questions on this, I'd be happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 21:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It does not exist to promote anything. It exists as a reporting of the world under terms of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability. As you note above, this theory is still underground, relatively unknown, and the posting of the article here was the first ever writing about it. This clearly makes it incompatible with our notability guidelines. As such, it was properly deleted. --Durin 22:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Wikipedia is interested in your writings on notable, verifiable subjects. If you still maintain that the One Thrust Theory is notable and verifiable, you may take the issue up at Wikipedia:Deletion review where other people can review your arguments (and that of others for/against its inclusion) and voice their support or opposition to the inclusion of this article in Wikipedia. --Durin 22:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
