User talk:Swatjester
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Inbox Comments Go HereHi Swat Jester. Thank you for your comment. It has been ignored and deleted. Have a nice day. --Emperor 03:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] JohnnyAlbert10Hi nice to meet you, thanks for the comments on my talk page. On the night of March 20, my brother showed up as User talk:512teking6, vandalized both my talk and user pages. And now he has my computer blocked my wikipedia soi have to use a laptop, and if he vandalizes wikipedia with this then i'm scrued. What do i do? Nice pages you got here, very creative. -- JohnnyAlbert10 2:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Five clicks to JesusDid you even bother to read the post I put up on the talk page, or the page itself? If you had, you would have realized that Five Clicks To Jesus is a harmless game. To quote the page "The purpose of the Five Clicks To Jesus game is simple. It's a game simply to pass the time. It's not intended to offend anyone or stir up any animosity." Also, I think I posted a rather eloquent argument to the speedy deletion on the talk page. In addition, I don't appreciate you calling it inappropriate and threatening to block me. How this simple game could be seen as inappropriate is beyond me. It's intended to simply waste time. I demand that your deletion of it be reviewed by another administrator. PhoenixFire296 05:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC) In all fairness, I only made the page just now. I wasn't even aware it had been created in the past. I got the idea from someone on Facebook and thought that a Wikipedia article for a Wikipedia game would be appropriate. In fact, I just registered my username in order to create the page. So saying that I'm responsible for creating and recreating it is just unfair. Blame the original creator, whoever that may be, for the first creation, but mine was wholly independent. PhoenixFire296 05:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC) [edit] Chink AfDThe Chink article has been greatly expanded now. Please take a look and see if you are interested in reconsidering your vote for merge. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC) [edit] User:Burgz33I noticed you blocked this user for 24 hours, however since then he continues the personal attacks, uncivil/disruptive behavior on this talk page. See [1] and [2]. A long block may be required? Your call. 03:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC) [edit] Personal attacks by User:FaranbazuGreetings. If you have time, could you please have a look at this [3], thanks! Shervink 13:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)shervink [edit] RFAHey. Thanks for supporting my RFA. It ended successfully. SGGH 20:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC) [edit] I put in references, added sources and presented verifiable data:The unfortunate thing is that it was all erased. After being told by one and all to put in the aforementioned things the places where I have done so were methodically followed and where I had gone back and added refernces, cources and quotations they were all "vanished". Now I suppose I will go back and do it all again? I don't think so. In my efforts to add information to "balance" the views on many pages as REQUESTED by your own editors I have been called "incomprehensible" and having written "nonsense". So when I went back and added the sources I was using and the quotes to show prehaps what I have written is not "nonsense"; my backing information was all erased. Hmm........... Should I even continue? I have a library of over three hundred titles I used to write my book: shall I now add it all again to back up my interpolations? And take the chance of being blocked? When my additions are vandalized so that I appear to be an idiot? Unicorn144 05:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC) This is probably a rhetorical question; can this be fixed?Unicorn144 05:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
