User talk:Svartulfr1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Rockpocket 21:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Notability

Hi, I have tagged the articles K. Brent Olsen, Sequoia Psychotherapy Center & San Francisco Bay Psychotherapy Center for notability concerns. Please see WP:BIO for guidelines on the notability of biographies and WP:CORP for guideliines concerning businesses. If you can add any information to these pages that meets these guidelines, I'd suggest doing so very soon. Articles that lack sufficient notability are often deleted. -- Scientizzle 22:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] a favor

Hello Svartulfr1!

Welcome to Wikipedia. I’ve seen your copyedits in the Anti-psychiatry article, which I and other editors rewrote last March.

Can I ask you a favor? When planning doing lots of copyedits, can you copy and paste the whole article (in Edit mode!) to your word processor and make the changes there before posting it again with your changes? It’s difficult for me, who edit Wikipedia only on Sundays, to track down dozens of very minor copyedits in the article.

Perhaps you may find it interesting the antipsychiatry-related articles I have created (just take a look at my user page)?

Welcome again and have fun! —Cesar Tort 04:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editing articles

Sorry about editing the articles in the wikipedia program. I will try to be sure to use my word processor program to edit articles at all times prior to doing the permanent edits here... Also, thanks for your referencing of some interesting articles you have put together...

[edit] Psychology Wiki

Hi there,

I thought you might also be interested in this daughter project of wikipedia, The Psychology Wiki. You are just the kind of contributor we are looking for there.

Tom Michael - Mostly Zen Image:Baby_tao.jpg (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] orphaned images

Hi there... In reviewing for orphaned files, I have found the following images that you have uploaded as public domain, but do not appear to be used in any way. Please place a link in some article or user space or tag them for deletion by placing the {{db-author}} template on the image page. If there are any questions, please let me know.

--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Male breast.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Male breast.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 18:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Sexology and sexuality

Do you still consider yourself active? Also, I'm trying to put together a new WikiProject called WikiProject Mental Health (fundamentally different from Psychology). There are gaping holes on Wikipedia in relation to this topic. Would you be interested? Get to know me on my user page and we'll discuss. NinaOdell | Talk 18:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World's Smallest Political Quiz userbox

You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.

Please reply to User talk:Audacity, as I will not be watching your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 07:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rating the ToK

Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System, along with discussing ways to improve the article. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 14:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for peer review

The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)