Talk:Suzanne Hinn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-13. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Benny Hinn.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Suzanne Hinn article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

[edit] Nominated for deletion

I have nominated this page for deletion mainly because it violates the WP:BLP. Let me state that I am NO fan of Benny or Suzanne Hinn and I am normally an inclusionist but this article is poorly sourced and the one source it does have I would question its reliability.

[unsourced/poorly-sourced derogatory statement removed from talk per BLP]

I also think for the most of this article also violates the WP:NPOV. This article needs to be better written with reliable sources or be deleted as it is a biography of a living person. Jamie Guinn 13:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Done Restarted as a stub. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I removed a copy of the poorly sourced derogatory statement above, since leaving it here would defeat the purpose of the deletion. Robert A.West (Talk) 14:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)