Talk:Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Georgia Supreme Court → Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state) — After looking at the titles of the Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state) and the Supreme Court of Georgia (country) I think "Supreme Court of Georgia" should link to a disambiguation page. The Georgia Supreme Court is not the common name for the Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state). The U.S. State of Georgia has double the population of the country of Georgia, and this is the English Wikipedia, making the Supreme Court of Georgia more commonly known for the court in the U.S. state of Georgia. I propose moving Supreme Court of Georgia to a disambiguation page with links directing people to either the Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state) or the Supreme Court of Georgia (country). Please let me know what you think. KnightLago 14:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

See also the discussion on the Georgia Supreme Court discussion page here. KnightLago 16:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Edited to change per naming conventions KnightLago 13:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

[edit] Survey - Support votes

• Support. I think that you are correct and I agree with your proposal.--Tlmclain | Talk 15:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Support - both Supreme Court articles should match the naming convention for the country and the state (i.e. Georgia (U.S. state) and Georgia (Country)). --Roswell native 17:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Support per nom. -Patstuart^talk|edits 03:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
• Support per nom. - Evv 05:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey - Oppose votes

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:

I think we have consensus on both discussion pages, so I am going to go ahead and make the moves. KnightLago 19:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.