Talk:Super Twins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Twins article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale.
TV This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on February, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
Archive
Archives

[edit] Plagiarizing-Paraphrasing

Could someone please rewrite the synopsis of this article? It reads like a very badly paraphrased version of this [1]. As a teacher, I'd already nick this for plagiarizing (again), but I'll give this some time. Shrumster 08:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Paraphrasing is allowed anyway. Plagarizing verbatim isn't. --Howard the Duck 08:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
But this level and/or quality of "paraphrasing" is tantamount to plagiarism. Just changing the order of words/swapping out for synonyms while retaining the same sentence and paragraph structure is not paraphrasing, at least where I come from. That's downright slacker-style plagiarism. Shrumster 20:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
But still it's not verbatim; the copyright thingy refers to info copy and pasted verbatim; if you'd want, you can get rid of the section or rewrite ot (don't watch this TV show so vdunno anything about this). --Howard the Duck 06:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Shrumster, yes I'm aware that my paraphrasing is haphazard. I actually intended this article as a stub. But don't worry, I'm going to improve the Synopsis section soon. :-) -- Perryv 15:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What happened to the rest of this talk page?

Just out of curiosity. --GracieLizzie 15:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

The whole article (including the talk page) had been deleted because of copyright violations. So I decided to create it again, but this time, I created it from scratch. (The original version was not started by me, however.) Then other editors contributed and cleaned up this article. :-) Perryv 08:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Restored. —Centrxtalk • 16:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I didn't know about the history of proposals for deleting this article. Thanks for restoring the archive. -- Perryv 17:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)