Talk:Summer Scent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	WikiProject Korea invites you to join in improving Wikipedia articles related to Korea. Community: Discussion - Notice board Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventions Navigation: Key topics - Browse - Portal
Korea-related tasks: edit refresh Collaboration of the month Create articles Cleanup articles Assess articles Add Korean text Maintain unstable articles Discuss articles for deletion Improve A-class articles Improve B-class articles Improve Start-class articles Improve D-class articles Improve Stub-class articles Improve top priority articles Improve high priority articles Improve medium priority articles Improve low priority articles Improve very low priority articles Articles to work on: Goguryeo, achieve consensus and neutral point of view. 2007-03-16 Comfort women, achieve stability. 2007-3-29 Tteok, expand. 2007-03-16 Jeongol (전골), create. 2007-03-16 Science and technology in Korea, create. 2007-03-17 Naval history of Korea, create. 2007-03-17 Revised Romanization of Korean, include reasonably complete rule set. 2007-03-29

Contents 1 korean names 2 review 3 these articles suck 4 NPOV Dispute and Possible Formality Dispute

[edit] korean names

in the previous version of this article, the character names seem to have come from the chinese (mandarin) pronunciations. i have changed them to the ones used the in official english subtitles for the series.

[edit] review

is it just me or does this article sound like a review of the series??? i'm nto really sure if it's meant to sound like that, but in other wikipedia articles i have not come across authors who write in the first person about their experience with something...

[edit] these articles suck

they're all POV and sound like some stupid fangirl review it on yesasia.com

[edit] NPOV Dispute and Possible Formality Dispute

I have taken the above claims to consideration and marked the article for its neutrality dispute. While a bit of non-neutrality was removed from the article from a recent edit, I still feel a bit of that "fangirl" like quality (quoting from above) when I read it. Below I shall list a few points that one should consider.

• The first paragraph lets a slight slip of a little bit of an opinion about the actors. While not too serious, it is still capable of being toned down.
• Opinions about the drama are shown in the last paragraph.

I also feel a lack of formality in the article, but I'm not entirely sure. Can someone check this? Bakazuki

I see the lack of formality; it is straight from a review site online, actually. I'm going to be bold and work around with it. Hurrah 15:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)