Sudden infant death syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Sudden infant death syndrome
Classification & external resources
ICD-10 R95.
ICD-9 798

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is any sudden and unexplained death of an apparently healthy infant aged one month to one year. The term cot death is often used in the United Kingdom, and crib death in North America.

Contents

[edit] Diagnosis

SIDS is a definition of exclusion. It should only be applied to an infant whose death is sudden and unexpected, and remains unexplained after the performance of an adequate postmortem investigation including:

  1. an autopsy;
  2. investigation of the scene and circumstances of the death; and
  3. exploration of the medical history of the infant and family.

Typically the infant is found dead after having been put to sleep, and exhibits no signs of having suffered.

The inexplicable nature of SIDS often leaves the parents with a deep sense of guilt in addition to their grief.

[edit] Conditions that may mimic SIDS

[edit] Risk factors and statistics

SIDS is responsible for roughly 50 deaths per 100,000 births in the U.S. It is responsible for far fewer deaths than congenital disorders and disorders related to short gestation, though it is the leading cause of death in healthy babies after one month of age.

Very little is known for sure about the possible causes of SIDS, and there is no proven method for prevention. Although studies have identified risk factors for SIDS, such as putting infants to bed on their stomachs, there has been little understanding of the syndrome's biological cause(s). The frequency of SIDS appears to be a strong function of infant sex and the age, ethnicity, education, and socio-economic status of the parents.

According to a study published in October 2006 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, babies who die of SIDS have abnormalities in the part of the brain that helps control functions like breathing, blood pressure and arousal. Researchers examined the brains of 31 babies who had died of SIDS and 10 who had died from other causes. They found that abnormalities in the brain stem appear to affect the ability to use and recycle serotonin, which is responsible for regulating mood as well as vital body functions. According to the National Institutes of Health, which funded the study, the new finding is the strongest evidence to date suggesting that innate differences in a specific part of the brain may place some at increased risk of dying from SIDS.[1]

Listed below are several factors associated with increased probability of the syndrome based on information available prior to this recent study.

[edit] Prenatal risks

[edit] Post-natal risks

  • low birth weight (especially less than 1.5 kg (~3.3 lb)
  • exposure to tobacco smoke
  • laying an infant to sleep on his or her stomach (see positional plagiocephaly)
  • failure to breastfeed
  • excess clothing and overheating
  • excess bedding, soft sleep surface and stuffed animals
  • gender (61% of SIDS cases occur in males)
  • age (incidence rises from zero at birth, is highest from two to four months, and declines towards zero at one year)
  • premature birth (increase risk of SIDS death by 50 times)

[edit] Risk reduction for SIDS

Though SIDS cannot be prevented, parents of infants are encouraged to take several precautions in order to reduce the likelihood of SIDS.

[edit] Environment

[edit] Sleep positioning

Place the infant on its back to sleep. Among the theories supporting this habit is the idea that small infants with little or no control of their heads may, while face down, inhale their exhaled breath or smother themselves on their bedding. Another theory states that babies sleep more soundly when placed on their stomachs, and are unable to rouse themselves when they have an incidence of sleep apnea, which is thought to be common in infants.

[edit] Breastfeeding

A study published in the May 2003 issue of Pediatrics [1] revealed that breastfeeding infants have 1/5 the rate of SIDS as formula-fed infants.[2]

Two other studies supported breastfeeding for reducing SIDS rates.[3][4]

[edit] Co-sleeping

A controversial approach to lowering SIDS rates is co-sleeping. Although a 2005 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics on sleep environment and the risk of SIDS condemned all co-sleeping and bedsharing as unsafe, empirical data[2] has suggested that almost all SIDS deaths in adult beds occur when other prevention methods, such as placing the infant on his back, are not used. Infant deaths in adult beds are also reduced when parents are non-smoking, not impaired by drugs or alcohol, not obese, and are not using fluffy comforters and pillows. A firm sleeping surface is also required, which rules out waterbeds or soft mattresses. With these factors accounted for, SIDS rates for co-sleeping infants are actually lower than for crib-sleeping infants. Parents also have newer room and bedsharing options including bedside and bedtop sleeping devices to make co-sleeping safer and more convenient.

A 2005 study states that "sleeping with an attentive, unimpaired mother is not only safe but biologically sound" (McKenna JJ, McDade T. Why babies should never sleep alone: a review of the co-sleeping controversy in relation to SIDS, bedsharing and breast feeding. Paediatr Respir Rev 2005;6:134–52. PMID 15911459). The practice of solitary sleep for infants leads, among other things, to an absence of exogenous stimuli that influence breathing, cardiovascular function, and sleep architecture in the sleeping infant. Sleep and waking states and state transitions are apparently produced by suites of state regulatory mechanisms that function as a dynamical system. Modeling of dynamical systems has demonstrated that they are organized, or “tweaked” by episodic, irregular inputs. Some investigators (Mosko et al., 1993; McKenna, 1996) have argued that cosleeping provides infants with stimuli that organize their immature systems and thereby buffer them from risk for regulatory failures in sleep over a developmentally vulnerable postnatal period. [3]

Research on co-sleeping indicates an excess risk with an adjusted Odds-Ratio of 2.71 (Vennemann et al., Acta Paediatr. 2005 Jun;94(6):655–60.) There is a good deal of debate and discussion in the medical literature about this (see below). For example, though findings are still preliminary and unpublished, the proximity of a parent's respiration is thought by some to stimulate proper respiratory development in the infant. It is interesting to note that the first epidemiologic investigation of sudden unexpected infant deaths by Templeman in Dundee in 1892 were shown to be probably from suffocation by overlaying (Williams et al., Sudden unexpected infant deaths in Dundee, 1882–1891: overlying or SIDS? Scott Med J. 2001 Apr;46(2):43–7).

[edit] Sleeping near the baby

Parents are also encouraged to sleep near their babies. 'Near' is generally understood to mean in the same room, but not in the same bed. Adult bedding often does not follow the 'no pillows, no fluffy blankets and firm mattresses only' instructions mentioned above. Keeping the baby in the same room as the parent is thought to allow the parent to be wakened by a baby in distress even if the child is unable to cry.

[edit] Secondhand smoke reduction

According to the U.S. Surgeon General’s Report (Chapter 5; pages 180–194), secondhand smoke is connected to SIDS. Infants who die from SIDS tend to have higher concentrations of nicotine and cotinine (a biological marker for secondhand smoke exposure) in their lungs than those who die from other causes. Infants exposed to secondhand smoke after birth are also at a greater risk of SIDS. Parents who smoke can significantly reduce their children's risk of SIDS by either quitting or smoking only outside and leaving their house completely smoke-free.

[edit] Sleeping area

[edit] Bedding

Only use a firm mattress with tight-fitting sheets in a crib or bassinet. No pillows, stuffed animals, or fluffy bedding should be used or placed in a crib. In cold weather, dress the infant warmly in well fitted clothing. Wearable blankets are preferable over loose blankets. These directions also stem from the belief that small babies with little or no control of their bodies may inadvertently smother themselves in their sleep.

[edit] Sleep sacks

In colder environments where bedding is required to maintain a baby's body temperature, the use of a sleep sack is becoming more popular. A study published in the European Journal of Pediatrics in August 1998 [4] has shown the protective effects of a sleep sack as reducing the incidence of turning from back to front during sleep, reinforcing putting a baby to sleep on their back for placement into the sleep sack and preventing bedding from coming up over the face which leads to increased temperature and carbon dioxide rebreathing. They conclude in their study "The use of a sleeping-sack should be particularly promoted for infants with a low birth weight."

[edit] Pacifiers

A 2005 study indicated that use of a pacifier is associated with a 90% reduction in the risk of SIDS (Li et al). PMID 16339767 It has been speculated that the raised surface of the pacifier holds the infant's face away from the mattress, reducing the risk of suffocation. Although suffocation is an actual cause, while SIDS refers to an unexplained infant death, in the absence of sufficient postmortem investigation, a SIDS diagnosis may result.

[edit] Bumper pads

Bumper pads may be a contributing factor in SIDS deaths and should be removed. Health Canada, the Canadian government's health department, issued an advisory [5] recommending against the use of bumper pads, with the warning that they may decrease the amount of oxygen rich air available to the baby:

The presence of bumper pads in a crib may also be a contributing factor for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). These products may reduce the flow of oxygen rich air to the infant in the crib. Furthermore, proposed theories indicate that the rebreathing of carbon dioxide plays a role in the occurrence of SIDS.

[edit] Baby monitors

The use of baby monitors, particularly those with motion sensors, can allow the parents to remotely keep track of their child and respond if the child is in distress.

[edit] Speculated associations

A number of theoretical causes have been proposed as a trigger for SIDS, but many of them are unproven or have not been thoroughly studied and peer-reviewed.

[edit] Brain disorder

A recently published research article by the Journal of the American Medical Association showed evidence that cells in the brainstem fail to develop receptors for Serotonin in the womb. This abnormality continues until after birth, supposedly until the end of their first year. This would account for there being few to no SIDS deaths after the first year of infancy and the reason the risk is more for premature infants. The SIDS Alliance/First Candle has posted a message about this along with a link to the abstract on their website (www.firstcandle.com), which can be accessed from the front page.

[edit] Vitamin C

Australian medical doctor Archie Kalokerinos claims to have done scientific and clinical research purporting to show that if vitamin C levels are adequate, it will prevent cot-death[6]. This has not been accepted by medical authorities.

[edit] Toxic gases

In 1989, a controversial piece of research by UK Scientist Barry Richardson claimed that all cot death was the result of toxic nerve gases being produced through the action of fungus in mattresses on compounds of phosphorus, arsenic and antimony. These chemicals are frequently used to make mattresses fire-retardant.

A major plank in this explanation is the widely-observed phenomenon that the risk of cot death rises from one sibling to the next. No satisfactory biological explanation for this has ever been put forward. Richardson claims that the cause is that parents are more likely to buy new bedding for their first child, and to re-use that bedding for later children. The more frequently used the bedding is, the more chance there will be that fungus has become resident in the material and thus the higher chance of cot death. A paper by Peter Fleming and Peter Blair [7] references evidence from other studies that both supports and refutes the increasing occurrence of SIDS with mattress sharing and suggests that this is still inconclusive.

In 1994, the New Zealand government, under the advice of Dr. Jim Sprott, issued advice recommending new parents to either buy bedding free of the toxic compounds or to wrap the mattresses in a barrier film to prevent the escape of the gases. Dr. Sprott claims that no case of cot death has ever been traced back to a properly manufactured or wrapped mattress [8].

However, a final report of The Expert Group to Investigate Cot Death Theories: Toxic Gas Hypothesis, published in May 1998 concluded that "there was no evidence to substantiate the toxic gas hypothesis that antimony- and phosphorus-containing compounds used as fire retardants in PVC and other cot mattress materials are a cause of SIDS. Neither was there any evidence to believe that these chemicals could pose any other health risk to infants." (See FSID Press release). The report also states that "in normal cot-like conditions it is not possible to generate toxic gas from antimony in mattresses" and "babies have also been found to die on wrapped mattresses." Dr. Sprott's website, however, claims [9] [10] that the study does not actually refute his theory:

Contrary to media publicity, the 1998 UK Limerick Report did not disprove the toxic gas theory - as a highly qualified environmental scientist has stated in the New Zealand Medical Journal. In fact, the Limerick Committee's experiments proved the fungal generation of toxic gases (forms of stibine and arsine) from cot mattress materials.

According to Dr. Sprott, as of 2006, the New Zealand government has not reported any SIDS deaths when babies have slept on mattresses wrapped according to his method. While the Limerick report claims that babies have been found to die on wrapped mattresses, Dr. Sprott argues that a chemical analysis of the bedding should be performed. He additionally claims that this part of the report was flawed [11]:

In February 2000 Dr Peter Fleming (a co-author of the Limerick Report and principal author of the UK CESDI Report) conceded that the claim that three babies in the United Kingdom had died of cot death on polythene-covered mattresses could not be substantiated.

[edit] Central Respiratory Pattern Deficiency

There is ongoing research in the pediatric/neonatal community that has begun to associate apnea-like breathing cessations in animal models with unusual neural architecture or signal transduction in central pattern generator circuits including the pre-Bötzinger complex [PMID 16203214]. It is possible that irregularities in neurotransmitter release (such as GABA, adenosine, and NMDA) or deficiencies in their associated receptors (including both GABAA, GABAB subtypes and NMDA-glutamate receptors) are linked to incomplete prenatal development as is evident in pre-term infants.

Genetic factors are also being studied with several rat and mouse knockouts.

[edit] Gender-linkage

There is a consistent 50% male excess in SIDS per 1000 live births of each sex. Any supposed cause of SIDS that is independent of sex (same risk for males and females) can be rejected a priori on that basis. Given a 5% male excess birth rate (105 male to 100 female live births) there appear to be 3.15 male SIDS per 2 female SIDS for a male fraction of 0.61. See http://wonder.cdc.gov and http://www3.who.int/whosis/menu.cfm?path=whosis,inds,mort&language=english for data on SIDS by gender in the U.S. and throughout the world. Mage and Donner (The fifty percent male excess of infant respiratory mortality. Acta Paediatr. 2004 Sep;93(9):1210–5; The X-linkage hypotheses for SIDS and the male excess in infant mortality. Med Hypotheses. 2004;62(4):564–7.) have shown that the 50% male excess could be caused by a dominant X-linked allele that occurs with a frequency of ⅓ that is protective of transient cerebral anoxia. An unprotected XY male would occur with a frequency of ⅔ and an unprotected XX female would occur with a frequency of 4⁄9. The ratio of ⅔ to 4⁄9 is 1.5 to 1 which matches the observed male 50% excess rate of SIDS.

Although many authors have found autosomal and mitochondrial genetic risk factors for SIDS they cannot explain the male excess because such gene loci have the same frequencies for males and females. Supporting evidence is found by examination of other causes of infant respiratory death, such as inhalation of food and other foreign objects. Although food is prepared identically for male and female infants, there is a 50% male excess of death from such causes indicating that males are more susceptible to the cerebral anoxia created by such incidents in exactly the same proportion as found in SIDS. See the data found at http://wonder.cdc.gov for 9ICD 911 and 912 death rates by sex.

The study which indicated that there was a relationship between fewer seratonin binding sites and SIDS noted that the boys "had significantly fewer serotonin binding sites than girls".

[edit] SIDS and child abuse

British former pediatrician Roy Meadow believes that many cases diagnosed as SIDS are really the result of child abuse on the part of a parent displaying Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (a condition which he was first to describe, in 1977). During the 1990s and early 2000s, a number of mothers of multiple apparent SIDS victims were convicted of murder, to varying degrees on the basis of Meadow's opinion. In 2003 a number of high-profile acquittals brought Sir Roy's theories into disrepute, and many now doubt their credibility. Several hundred murder convictions were reviewed, leading to several high-profile cases being re-opened and convictions overturned.

A mathematical discussion of the errors in Roy Meadow's analysis is presented here by Professor Ray Streater of King's College London. This also includes this link to an "unprecedented intervention" by the Royal Statistical Society.

[edit] Nitrogen dioxide

A recent study by researchers at the University of California, San Diego suggests a link between nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels and SIDS.[5] However, this is only one of many possible risk factors and is not considered causal.

[edit] Vaccination

Some mention has been made of the link between vaccinations and SIDS, however no evidence has been presented to confirm this link. A study in the British Medical Journal[12] determined that there was actually a decrease in SIDS risk for infants that had undergone immunizations. Other studies[13][14] indicate that there is very little difference in risk.

[edit] SIDS in popular culture

In the UK, BBC TV presenter Anne Diamond became involved in raising awareness of cot death after her son, Sebastian, died from the syndrome in 1991.

The novel Lullaby by Chuck Palahniuk begins with a string of crib deaths which the main character discovers are caused by parents unwittingly reading their children a "culling poem."

A baby dies of SIDS at the beginning of an episode of the HBO television series Six Feet Under ("The Trip"), originally broadcast in 2001.

In 2005 or 2006, the courtroom TV show Judge Hatchett included a case in which a woman sued her baby's father for funeral expenses accumulated by her child's death from SIDS.

Sam, the son of Brad Pitt's character in the 2006 film Babel, is believed to have died of SIDS.

In musician and stand-up comedian Stephen Lynch's song "Ugly Baby," he sings about how ugly his new baby is and asks "Is it wrong to hope for SIDS?"

The Punk band The SIDS took their name from the deadly syndrome.

[edit] Research

Several papers by Derrick Lonsdale on SIDS are cited at SIDS Research Summaries.[6]

[edit] References

  • Li DK, Willinger M, Petitti DB, Odouli R, Liu L, Hoffman HJ. Use of a dummy (pacifier) during sleep and risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): population based case-control study. BMJ 2005. PMID 16339767.
  1. ^ Link to October 2006 JAMA article abstract
  2. ^ Hauck F. R., Herman S. M., Donovan M., Iyasu S., Merrick Moore C., Donoghue E., Kirschner R. H., Willinger M. (2003). "Sleep environment and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in an urban population: the Chicago Infant Mortality Study". Pediatrics 111: 1207–1214. 
  3. ^ Hoffman H.J., Damus K., Hillman L., Krongrad E., (1988). "Risk Factors for SIDS: Results of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SIDS Cooperative Epidemiologic Study". Ann NY ACAD Sci 533: 13–30. 
  4. ^ Mitchell, A. (1991). "Results from the First Year of The New Zealand Count Death Study". N.Z. Med A 104: 71–76. 
  5. ^ Klonoff-Cohen H., Lam P. K., Lewis A. (2005). "Outdoor carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and sudden infant death syndrome". Archives of Disease in Childhood 90: 750–753. 
  6. ^ SIDS Research Summaries

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/u/d/Sudden_infant_death_syndrome.html"