Talk:Studio 2B
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Studio 2B is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article was the project's Portal collaboration of the month (June 2006). |
 |
Girl Guiding and Girl Scouting task force |
Contents |
[edit] More changes to the GS Program
GSUSA is now phasing out Studio 2B in favor of the new level divisions (including the new Girl Scout Ambassadors for grades 11-12), as indicated in Girl Scout levels (USA). The article should probably be modified to reflect this. --Icefaerie 06:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cleaning this page
I took up the task of cleaning and prepareing this page. Griz 21:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- As it currently stands, the article has a lot of what might be construed as Original research, which is a big no-no on Wikipedia. Perhaps if some sources can be found to verify the information it'll seem less so. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 21:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Documentation is important on wiki for a "quality" article. A good example of how to do it is History of merit badges (Boy Scouts of America), which is the only Scouting article to have Featured Article status. See that article and our Rules and Standards on how to do the "ending sections" (See also, Footnotes, References, External links, etc).Rlevse 22:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- All original research is gone from the article and it has been CEed several times. The ball is finally moving on it. Darthgriz98 15:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] cleaning the article
I took out things that could not be backed as easily so it did not sound like original research. And I put in some more sources I used for this article. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Darthgriz98 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- You keep misspelling article (it's not artical).Rlevse 01:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Ah it appears that I have, oy, sorry bout that and thanks. Griz 00:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed merge of Focus Book
The book is an main part in the programm but it doesn't stand on its own. --jergen 07:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Agree with Jergen, plus it's too short. Rlevse 10:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I concur, the Focus book is basicaly well the focus point of Studio 2B. Darthgriz98 17:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge as per common sense --Shawn 21:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Focus Book has been merged with Studio 2B. Darthgriz98 21:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of Controversy Section
This section is largely uncited and I and other can find no proof of it, I know it does happen, but we can't have it in here unless we find some media proof. Now if anybody finds anything, by all means cite it and put it in. Darthgriz98 20:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] History section and new image
I have finally found some history on Studio 2B, stuck it in, and cited it. Also, the old Studio 2B logo on the page was a grainy and unattractive .gif file so I uploaded a different, cleaner version. Darthgriz98 15:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
