User talk:Stoic atarian/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Stoic atarian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Jrcoga! 06:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Neutral POV?

You posted a box at the top of the article Flag of Bikini Atoll stating that the neutrality of the article is in dispute. To me, I don't see how the article is biased. Please post something on its talk page explaining why you think this. On a different note, welcome to Wikipedia. SeanMD80talk | contribs 01:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] THE BIG WORLD

FYI - {{nonsense}} and {{db-nonsense}} are the same. No need to change one to the other. Fan-1967 04:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Forklift truck

Could you please indicate on Forklift truck's talk page why you think it needs wikification as it's not obvious to me. Thanks, Rich257 11:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trevor Nelson

I have removed the speedy tag you placed on Trevor Nelson, as presenting shows on BBC Radio One and MTV is a clear assertion of notability. You may still take the article to AfD if you wish. Oldelpaso 17:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:The is the

This user's contributions seem to be a single, minor, edit. I'm assuming he/she has created bogus articles, but you didn't specify. Could you list a few so I can verify them? Rklawton 18:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism ie. User:The is the

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! feydey 18:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] AIV Reports

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! alphachimp 19:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ahlul Bayt Islamic Centre

Hi there; I did not think that this article warranted speedy deletion, and have removed your tag. If you feel strongly about it, you might think about taking it to AfD.--Anthony.bradbury 21:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on their IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

proxy

Sorry, we do not permit editing from open proxies. — Yamla 18:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


Note: declined unblock requests may only be removed after two days or when the block has expired.

[edit] User_talk:Stoic_atarian

You said: "I'm confused as to what makes my ISP qualify as an open proxy. Do you have a link to the official policy regarding proxies being blocked on Wikipedia?"

You didn't dispute that it was a proxy so I didn't check. If you have reason to believe that it isn't, let me know and I will look into it. The policy in question is Wikipedia:No open proxies. --Yamla 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
By the way, that you were able to edit my page is evidence that you are not currently blocked. --Yamla 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] State v. Kelly

I have added several further references and removed the notability tag from State v. Kelly. A google seach here shows that this case is being cited in numerous other cases across the US and is notable from the number of citations it gets. If you are still concerned then an AfD is the way to go. BlueValour 22:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding unwarrented vandalism warnings to User:Pokalo's talk page. Splitting a paragraph into two or adding some lines for formatting can not be construed as vandalism. Rklawton 13:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael West's Notability

You have flagged the page for Michael West as not being a notable subject. The man has founded two publically traded corporations which both still in operation and involved in cutting edge technology, is a leader in stem cell reserach, which is one of the most prominent issues of the day, and is one of the most famous gerontologists in the world. I think that he is worthy of having on page on Wikipedia.


Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you.