Talk:Storm Warning (Doctor Who audio)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dr Who This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is supported by the Radio WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article attached to this page and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. Visit the wikiproject page for more details.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] title/disambig

Do we have the right to hog Storm Warning for the Doctor Who audio? The two books have a fair number of links to them, and even though the 1951 film doesn't have an article yet it sounds like it's probably notable for its cast, if nothing else. Should we move this to Storm Warning (Doctor Who audio)? —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 18:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree - I was searching for "storm warning" and came across this page instead. I've moved it as you suggested and redirected Storm Warning to Storm warning. (Generally speaking, the difference between "W"arning and "w"arning isn't considered sufficient for avoiding errors. --Ckatzchatspy 09:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Apologies, I've still got a few links to update with regards to this move. I'll try to get to them as quickly as possible. Thanks. --Ckatzchatspy 02:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
I changed a lot of links so they now link to Storm Warning (Doctor Who audio) instead of Storm warning - Antmusic 23:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for doing so - and my apologies for not getting back to this in due course. It's been a busy time, both on and off-wiki, but I regret the inconvenience nevertheless. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 05:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
No problem-o, I fix 'em when I see 'em. Nothing annoys me more when I click a link to read more about something and it brings me to something un-exact or a disambiguation page. There were only about 20 links, and they were easy to find with the "What links here" on the Storm warning page. - Antmusic 15:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)