Talk:Still Reigning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Good article Still Reigning has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Slayer , a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Slayer. If you would like to participate please visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Failed GA

This article won't meet GA standards until you provide a source (preferably inline) on every statement. If this is already met, I apologize for the misconception, and will pass it. If not, fix it, relist it, and it'll probably be passed. DoomsDay349 01:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Got your message on my talk page. So, you're saying that in a paragraph where two statements appear, the reference covers them both? If so, I will be glad to reverse my decision and pass the article. DoomsDay349 20:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you can check the references to verify if you want. M3tal H3ad 00:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Failed (again)

Please try making the necessary improvements to the article and waiting, this article (as it seems above) has been repeatedly nominated in the past month. The article will not pass unless the following changes are made and any others

  1. This article needs some expansion, however only expand it if the info is worth it, if its not relevant info in which you are adding, ignore this
  2. Cite all your sources and format them properly, there are about three number 1's and three number 2's.
  3. Try not to repeat information (eg it was recorded at ?? centre in 2004), its highly annoying and this could stop it from passing in future.
  4. Add the relevant interwiki links to it, such as on dates etc (see [Wikipedia:Wikify|Wikify]]). Please consider being patient and waiting, repeatedly nominating it will just make it look like the article or nominator is desperate for it to become a good article. Thanks.Tellyaddict 22:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  1. It either needs expansion or it doesn't. Is it as comprehensive as one would demand of a Good Article? It could probably use a little more on context and critical reception but I don't see any glaring omissions.
  2. If they're from the same source they share a number. Refs look fine to me in that regard. Some of the sources look a little less than hot but this isn't an FAC.
  3. See WP:LEAD. The lead should summarise the article. If they tell us in the lead it was recorded in 2004, they should tell us the same in the body - just with more detail.
  4. What links in particular are missing?

Now, I've never seen this video, don't listen to this band, and I'm not saying this should or shouldn't be a GA. I just see a bit of a shortage of informed reviewing going on here. --kingboyk 01:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Kingboyk - the discussion has been resumed at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 20:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Many dates wikilinked unnecessarily; this is distracting.
  • Still needs more copyediting for grammar/punct. etc. though I made a first pass at it.
  • Why no mention in the lead of the awards the video received?
  • Any controversy? Anyone saying that it represents a decline in moral values of modern society etc etc etc blah blah blah?
  • Will look again later.
  • --Ling.Nut 21:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • All full dates are linked properly per WP:DATE, and shouldn't be delinked.
  • Obviously, heavy metal is controversial for that all the time, however this video has no specific controversy. Michaelas10 (Talk) 15:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I didn't say the dates were improperly linked; I said there was absolutely no reason to link to them. But "As you wish." :-)
  • I emailed some stuff to LuciferMorgan that may be useful for this article. --Ling.Nut 16:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Those emails are now in the possession of M3tal H3ad, the primary author of the article. LuciferMorgan 10:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • OK, if I find anything else on this particular topic, I'll email it to M3tal H3ad. Good luck with the article! --Ling.Nut 13:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/t/i/Talk%7EStill_Reigning_9d75.html"