User talk:Stevob2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Plezzo

The article Plezzo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. - Abstract Idiot (talk • contribs)

[edit] Re; AbsIdi Plezzo

Plezzo could not of been speedily deleted, as I had maintained the article and the fast changing information being passed into the article for some time. So meh to you, and yes it was me who got you banned

[edit] Regarding edits made during September 5, 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BigNate37_(T) 09:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User:BigNate37, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. thunderboltz^(Deepu) 09:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:BigNate37, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. thunderboltz^(Deepu) 09:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. -- thunderboltz^(Deepu) 09:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Steve Irwin

Your recent edit to Steve Irwin (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Mushroom (Talk) 09:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for 1 week

I have extended your block for a period of 1 week because of your vandalism of Steve Irwin. Please be aware that if you continue to vandalise articles you will end up being blocked indefinitely. Regards, The Land 09:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ST47Talk 19:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

hi me

0a.co.uk

[edit] Sean Eakins

This article was a non-notable biography according to the criteria set out in WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 22:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

So bringing gay rights to a school via violent campaigns on teaching staff is un-notable? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stevob2006 (talk • contribs).

Firstly, please sign your comments with four tildes, ~~~~, to make it easier for editors to respond to comments on their Talk pages. Secondly, the biography was non-notable according to the criteria set out in WP:BIO, which is the reason why it was deleted. (aeropagitica) 23:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

Hello, Stevob2006! I see that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my talk page. Good luck with Wikipedia! --Daniel Olsen 04:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to John Meyendorff

Your recent edit to John Meyendorff (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Squirrel (DHT)

You have been reported for your edit to Squirrel (DHT). -- Librarianofages 01:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blatant vandalism

For the above and a series of vandalism attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Ian Cairns 01:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. Vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated.--WinHunter ^(talk) 01:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Graz-Umgebung

Reported for your edit to Graz-Umgebung -- Librarianofages 02:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, you have already been blocked indefinitely, since it's clear that you are not here to contribute. Academic Challenger 02:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

This is proof he's only here to vandalize. Here, have a link to his complete handiwork.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PicA4D98BfwTNTfan101 03:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Atominteractive.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Atominteractive.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)