User talk:Stevietheman/1H2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Image question

Stevie,

I have pictures that I personally took of nearly every building on the Bellarmine University campus. I'm planning on massively expanding the Bellarmine University article content with info on the building histories, etc. I have a couple of questions:

  • What pics should I upload?
  • Should I upload them to en or to commons?
  • What licensing should I use?

Thanks, Carl (talk|contribs) 04:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

  • You can upload as many as you like, as any extra can be placed in a gallery at the end of the article.
  • If you see significant use outside the Wikipedia, upload to Commons; otherwise, upload to en.
  • I would use a free license that maintains credit for yourself, such as GFDL or Creative Commons. If you have no issue with completely giving them away, then make them public domain.

Hope this helps. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Map of Kentucky with Farm Background.gif

Great, now I feel like I want to live there... 68.39.174.238 23:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Cat class

Does our template for WikiProject Kentucky include a Cat class? Acdixon 16:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes. That's why I substituted it. I was going to leave a note in WP:KY, but you beat me to that by posting here. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't the template indicate that items designated Cat class do not require a quality rating? I'd make it do that myself, but I'm not sure how. Acdixon 16:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Yep, the template needs some more surgery done on it, like I did for WP:Louisville. But I can't get to that until later today. Hope that's OK. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Completely fine with me; I appreciate the help. If I can do anything, let me know. Acdixon 16:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again for the help on the template. Hope the assessment system will breathe some new life into the project. It's been kinda dead since you left! Acdixon 15:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Just now noticed that you are back with the project. Welcome back! Looking forward to working with you again. Acdixon 15:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I noticed that some project templates support a flag for articles to be merged or articles needing attention. Do we have such a flag in our template? If so, we need to document it on the assessment page. Acdixon 16:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

In WikiProject Louisville, to handle these other parameters, as well as additional ways to flag articles that need attention, I created the "Articles Needing Attention" Department. You could pretty much copy it as-is to WikiProject Kentucky, changing 'Louisville' to 'Kentucky'. The only exception is that there's no todo list template or category specific to WikiProject Kentucky at this time. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
We have the relevant categories. I just need to know if adding 'attention=yes' and 'merge=yes' on the template will properly categorize the related article. Acdixon 17:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
It should. It can be tested by using "Show preview". Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Why didn't I think of that? LOL For the record, it works. Thanks again. Acdixon 19:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Week

The best existing proposal I can, in my own limited way, think of for the previously discussed "appreciation week" can now be found at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week#Wikipedia Week. Any comments or responses would be more than welcome. Badbilltucker 15:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

amusement park category - accidents

noticed you came behind me to clean up what I left behind. My idea was to mark the park pages the accidents occured in as well as the individual ride page (if existed). Your thoughts on the perceived miscat? SpikeJones 19:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

It is a miscat because an amusement park is not an accident. It is an overcat because most/all amusement parks have accidents. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Reasonable answer. Thx. (while we're on the subject, how do you feel about subcategories of accidents, such as "Amusement park accidents|Disney" for display on that category page?)
Well, that kind of category sorting might confuse readers. I would say that if there were a good number of articles that would fall under Disney-related accidents, then create a subcategory and group them there. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 02:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Kentucky Related Ships

I was going back to revert my edit after reading your comments, but you beat me to it. I was thinking we shouldn't mess with them until after the cfd is complete. If you plan on working on this grouping, alot of LST's are named for counties. The Navy named them for multiple counties if more than one existed. Doing the research I find some funny trends. All most all of the LST's named for WV counties are all in the former WV 2nd Congressional district. Somebody had some pull. --71Demon 17:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Pages are generally allowed to be edited during xfD periods. I only have an interest on where the Kentucky-related category is placed, as I'm a caretaker of the Kentucky category hierarchy. I'll let the other states handle their own versions of this category. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I knew they were allowed to be edited. Hopefully you have some Navy people to work on categorizing all the ships. --71Demon 22:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

my Apologies

I will be more mindful in the future. I 'am also waiting for that varification email from that website you referred me to. Louisvillian 20:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

If you're the one who registered as "LouisvilleSlugger", the verification email bounced. Maybe it was a typo in the address you supplied. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

In other news...

In a completely non-Wikipedia-related thought, I must say that I liked your suggestion for the whole 22nd Street naming issue that you proposed in last week's LEO. I thought it had just that right touch of humor, irony and wit.

Cheers, Carl (talk|contribs) 20:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. They almost never let me know when they're going to print my letters, although strangely enough, they print almost every one I send over. Anyway, I wonder if my "make-everyone-happy" solution will actually make most people enraged. Time will tell.  :) Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Louisville template

You should create a template for Louisville neighborhoods/ suburbs, like the one LA has —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.225.124.43 (talk • contribs).

Great idea! thanks. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

List of famous Kentuckians

I just asked FloNight to move List of famous Kentuckians to List of people from Kentucky (as suggested multiple times in the list's failed Featured List nomination), but she's reluctant to do so until we find out why it was moved from List of people from Kentucky to begin with. Looks like you were the one to create the redirect. What was the reason for that? Acdixon 14:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Personal preference at the time. But I have no issue with it being renamed back to what has become the (sterile) standard. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Kentucky categories

Why would Kentucky be different than all the other US states? Thanks Hmains 22:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

You have to clear any changes with WikiProject Kentucky. If you don't, I'm reverting every change you make. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Please see the WP definition of 'Settlements' (1) and the WP Category 'Settlements' and its sub-categories. 'Settlements' includes cities, towns, villages of any size or location and is the standard collective term for such human habitations. Thanks Hmains 01:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Then why weren't all states using this term as you claim? Massachusetts isn't, and Indiana wasn't until you just changed it today. Further, we're not in pioneer times. It's degrading to call contemporary cities 'settlements'. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 01:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
You can start by actually reading what I write and not asserting things I did not say. Next, please look at the 'Settlement' article, the 'Settlements' category, the 'Settlements by region' category, and the 'Settlements in the United States' category and not concentrate on what I created. All this existed prior to my work and I found these when I was looking for an appropriate collective WP term for human habitations. There is no indication whatsoever that 'settlements' is an archaic term applying only to the subset of human habitations that you have asserted. Thanks Hmains 18:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
My position is that it is not the best term. It connotes the wrong things. "Political subdivisions" or "Administrative divisions" makes more sense. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Just because that's the way it was going doesn't make it the best way to go. There's nothing wrong with wanting to use the best term for categorization. I disagree that "settlements" is the best term. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
These other terms imply something what is not legally or politically true in the case of most countries and certainly the United States. They are true only in a top-down state where such divisions are made at the state level for the convenience of the state and which cover all land area of the state. Example is 'county' in most of the United States states, which are legal creatures of the state, and cities, towns and villages are not. 'Settlement' is neutral and world wide--it just refers to where concentrations of people live and does not involve 'administration'. In any case, I did not invent this WP use; I am just using it. Hmains 18:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm willing to drop this as a dispute, but we need to open this up to the community-at-large and let them decide. I'm willing to accept a community decision, no matter what it is. I don't agree that 'settlement' is neutral in the respect that it connotes things that don't well apply to contemporary cities. I'm not married to any specific term, but we need to at least consider alternatives to 'settlement'. And if the community decides on something else, it wouldn't take much of an effort by a bot to change it over. I'd rather do this than submit these categories for renaming (which is something I can do if this isn't opened up). I don't want to make this a dispute, but rather a community conversation. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Fine, I am not working on WP to be involved in disputes/do not like them. I do not know, however, where, in WP, enough potentially interested parties will notice a discussion so they could think about it and comment on it. Thanks Hmains 18:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Three-Revert Rule, January 12, 2007 UTC

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Louisville, Kentucky. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Please call someone else in to help you stop vandalism. Hersfold 23:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

The rule doesn't apply to reverting vandalism, or have the rules changed? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't really see what the IP guy is doing is vandalism. His alternate spelling might be a little off, but it doesn't seem to be changing the pronunciation any, he's just adding an apostrophe. Just leave it for a day, and change it back when he's not logged in. What you're doing right now is getting ridiculous. Here, read this: 3RR and simple vandalism Hersfold 23:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The guy is clearly playing games with us. This is his second IP in a short period, and he has been doing vandalism left and right. I slapped a fact tag on his change. I think that given you don't understand what's happened here, you need to back off calling my normal rvv's ridiculous. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
A fact tag is fine, it calls attention to the fact that his edit may be wrong, and it's not reverting back to what it was. Sorry if I offended with the "ridiculous" remark, that wasn't my intention. I'm just trying to keep the both of you from getting kicked out. Ok? Hersfold 23:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't apply to reverting vandalism. Please keep up and re-read the rules Hersofold. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Check the link I posted and read them yourself, please. 3RR and simple vandalism Hersfold 00:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I did: "it should be dealt with in the long term preferrably by switching to blocking of vandalistic editors". This stuff could have been avoided if this user was blocked from the get-go. Louisville is an FA article. It will be protected from vandals. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Guys, please keep up the good work, but do not be divided by the drive-by editors who do not care at all about our guidelines. I have semi-protected the article for the time being. Thanks/wangi 00:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Wangi. Stevie, yes, the user should have been blocked once it was clear he was going to start an edit war. So report him to the administrators! They can handle this sort of thing, as Wangi fortunately did. Please, let's end this argument, it's not getting us anywhere. Hersfold 00:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Where is a listing board for admins available to answer a call immediately to protect an article? And I mean, immediately. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism Ta-da! I reported a vandal there once, and an administrator had taken action on the page within half an hour. With as many admins as there are, you can probably expect action in about that time or less. Hersfold 00:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Sounds like it would have been too slow for this case, but I'll put the link on my user page for future use. Thank you. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, WP:AIV is good for the obvious cases (and I would normally slap a ban on that IP user if wasn't for the other chat on their talk page) or WP:ANI or the more complex cases/wangi 00:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
To clearify, I did report both IPs to WP:AIV. The first was blocked for three hours, the second was not ("not that much vandalism" was the reason given). Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
To add, after I made the mention of reporting, was when the second IP vandal began to 'constructively' edit the articles in an attempt to puff up his appearance as a legitimate editor. And it appearantly worked, unfortunately. At least the article is semi-protected, so the IP vandal can't edit. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Note one of the anon's "worthwhile" edits to Downtown Louisville. He changed "also called" to "also known as" so he could probably say "See, there's nothing you can challenge about this edit". I mean, this is clear-as-a-bell game playing here. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 03:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm so confused by all the recent edits. At least the IPuser is trying to be legitimate; better than a vandal. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 08:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your service

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your help in preventing recent vandalism at Louisville, Kentucky and at other articles in the past. Your efforts are much appreciated! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

502

was there something wrong with what I posted about the supposed hanging? Why would some facts about the legends be excluded, yet the unfounded legends themselves are fair game? this just seems contradictory to me. And I'm not attacking your actions, nor getting defensive. I'm trying to find out how things work in here since I'm new to it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamky (talk • contribs).

last change

I graduated from there so I have more right to make changes to it than you do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.149.248.165 (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

See WP:OWN. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't vandalize Collegiate

What is your problem with my Collegiate edits? I graduated from there, you did not. What I am writing is fact. Leave it up there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.149.248.165 (talk) 20:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC).

Reverting nonsense is not vandalism. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Conflicts with Animesouth (talk • contribs)

Hey there. I recently had some problems with this editor also, and I have gone and filed an WP:ANI about him. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 19:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll join in. He is persistently libeling Muhammad Ali, and won't explain his actions. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I've chimed in, as the user (and it's socks) are violating WP:LIVING, WP:CITE and WP:NPOV. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets filed at WP:SSP. See the case here. Please contribute to that if you can! Thanks Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Muhammad Ali Center

I was given a media pass to photograph and document the Muhammad Ali Center a few days ago. My question is, my Towns & Cities guide at American Byways (under Museum Row) will contain this and the Arts and Crafts museum. Should I pass along one or two exhibit photographs?

The media kit contained information about the building itself, along with information regarding the plaza and a map. I'll try to scan that in at work Monday and add it to the article, along with more information. Cheers, Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

If you can navigate the copyright issues that go with uploading these images, and comply with Wikipedia requirements, it sounds like a great addition. I'm not sure I fully understand the question you're asking, but with galleries, there's not really a limit as to how many pictures can go in the article. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 05:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi protection

I see you were asking about semi-protection on Lewis and Clark Expedition. If you go to the log for that article, you will see that the protection that was put in on the 24th was only for 24 hours, but the {{semiprotected}} tag was not removed then. As you can see, I sprotected for another 24 hours. Do you think it needs more? --rogerd 04:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I was just confused about it not working. The article could probably use a few more days protection, as a way of encouraging the vandals to move on to other activities. This has been an article that has acted like a magnet for the vandals, and I'd like for them to see we mean business. Thanks for your response. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 05:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I am still bummed that you don't have the mop yourself. I hope to try to help you get it sometime soon. --rogerd 11:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Tagging Louisville images

I'll put it on my to do list. It won't be hard at all. While I'm at it, I'll run through all the project categories again (it's actually easier than just picking a category or two), so I may find a few new articles for you as well. I'm right in the middle of a huge tagging effort (Baseball, with 3700 more articles to tag), so I'm not sure when I'll get to it. I'll leave you a message when it's done though. Ingrid 01:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Registration on your site

when tried to register on your site they said my email address was already taken —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.128.200.135 (talk • contribs).

Do you mean my discussion board? If so, I virtually don't support AOL addresses as AOL plays games with their e-mail. If any emails get through, it's a miracle. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 03:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Rating lists

Soldan and I are just about finished rating WikiProject Kentucky articles by class, but neither of us knows exactly how to rate the lists. What's your suggestion? Are they non-article until such time as they make Featured list? What do you guys do over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville? Maybe copy your suggestions on Soldan's talk page as I'm about to embark on an 8-hour drive for a business trip to Mansfield, Ohio in about half an hour and won't be able to do anything about it anyway. Thanks as always. Acdixon 17:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

User:MyWikiBiz

Pardon me for asking, but is there a reason you have a link to an indefinitely banned spammer's business (centiare.com) on your user page? --Calton | Talk 08:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I did not know this wiki was linked to a specific Wikipedian. How was I supposed to know? I found out about the site outside of Wikipedia. I just think it is an interesting wiki. Besides, Wikipedia puts nofollow on links. And it's not prominent on the page. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I reviewed much of the user talk about this user. I do find that his behavior in here was questionable, and he was indefinitely banned for it. However, his follow-on project Centiare appears to be a legitimate free directory that doesn't have anything to do with what MyWikiBiz was doing. I think it is an interesting example of a wiki, and just because he angered some here doesn't mean Centiare isn't interesting. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Citing sources

Note there is no official method for citing sources, per WP:CITE. There are numerous options available, including embedded citations, full citations, Harvard referencing, citation templates (what you suggest) and footnotes. Your assertion that they must be used goes against the grain per WP:CITE, as they are not required per policy. "They may be used at the discretion of individual editors, subject to agreement with the other editors on the article. Some editors find them helpful, while other editors find them annoying, particularly when used inline in the text. Because they are optional, editors should not change articles from one style to the other without consensus."

Let's come to a consensus first before changing reference styles. It adds a considerable amount of text and space that is wasted. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 16:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I didn't say they are required. They are a much cleaner way of providing references. We'll have to disagree on this one. The "wasted space" is of no concern to me. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry if you don't want to play by the policies at WP:CITET. Too bad they are well defined. You have an equal chance to achieve consensus and debate. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't know what is making you act this way all of a sudden, but it reflects much more on you than on me. Why all the nastiness and threats? Why the lack of reasonableness? It's shameful that you had to end our good working relationship this way. Goodbye. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
As I said before, you did not gather consensus per WP:CITET nor took up my suggestion for a request for comments. Had you done that instead of reverting, or at least left a message for debate, this could have been avoided. Seeing that you are currently listed at 3RR, I did not want this to escalate to another possible violation (although I agree that your 3RR with AnimeSouth was improperly filed since her edits were purely vandalism). Seicer (talk) (contribs) 17:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Go have fun with the article you now own. I took it off my watchlist. I don't care about that shitty plaza any more. It looks like shit anyway. You already done the damage, now go. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Heated arguments get you nowhere. You still haven't answered my questions: Why did you violate WP:CITET then try to shift the blame on me? Why did you not request comments at WP:RFC? Seicer (talk) (contribs) 17:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Stop wasting my time. I'm not responding to anything regarding this matter any more. I am convinced you are not acting in good faith. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
OK, after calming down, I can't let this go, as there are baseless accusations here. One cannot "violate" a guideline; this only applies to policies. The blame is yours because you acted in a nasty and threatening manner toward me and inexplicably insisted upon dirty references, that is, references that have their own 'Seicer' style, when they could instead follow the traditional model as enforced by the cite templates. If you were acting within reason, you would have at least agreed to reformat the references in the way the templates would create. Instead, you attack and threaten me, and defend the indefensible.
Further, going to WP:RFC would be an extreme response, and I don't do extreme responses after a "1-revert edit war" as you seem to think it was. I would prefer that you stop acting like you own Louisville Museum Plaza and at least agree to format the references properly, even if the templates aren't used. If you can't acknowledge that your reference formatting style is untraditional, then that is a sign of acting in bad faith, as the formats are obviously out of whack.
Again, I'm sorry that you have decided that working with me is no longer of interest to you. Calling one revert an "edit war" and calling me a "violator" and insisting I take an extreme route over a minor matter indicates there are some issues going on, and frankly, I don't have to deal with nonsense like that. My time is too valuable for that.Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

New category: Caves of Kentucky

Since you deal much more with the category hierarchy of Kentucky than I, I wanted to make you aware that I created a new one: Category:Caves of Kentucky. I think it's done right, but I just thought I'd let you know so you could double-check. I based it on the existing category Category:Caves of Wisconsin. Acdixon 16:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Kentucky

Well Steve neither poll presented specify's as to what region of whatever state identifies with whatever region. I think that the assumption that the people in Northern ky are the 20% is flase. I think think that the Eastern Kentuckians are a signifigant amount of that percentage as that region is Appalachia and is similar to West Virginia. As it is similar to West Virginia opinions on regional identity may may be refelcted across state lines as West Virginia was a state in which less than half of it's residents identified with the South in both questions. The 20% is signifigant and I have addressed that in the Southern talk page, however Gator for some odd reason tries to ignore the 80% of the population who identifies with the South, or he tends to over assert the minority. Again I have always acknowledged Kentucky is a mixed state, however the stance that I have proven is that it's more Southern than Midwestern. Louisvillian 20:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Louisville images tagged

I tagged the Louisville images for you a week or so ago, and I think I forgot to let you know. Ingrid 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I noticed it happening. Thanks for doing it! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

louisville vandal

Hi, the unemployed vandal has been causing a lot of havoc. I found out his name, homepage, and email, in addition to his school. I would like to help wikipedia pursue legal action against this individual.

Aliases: Unemployed, living in a basement, louisville vandal, jbm, Brando03
Name: Jeffrey B. Morris
Email: jbmorr03@louisville.edu
Website: http://louisville.edu/~jbmorr03/

IP Addresses:

4.225.127.64 [ 8 Posts ]   
4.224.120.41 [ 8 Posts ]        
4.225.112.196 [ 6 Posts ]       
136.165.88.21 [ 6 Posts ]       
4.225.114.196 [ 6 Posts ]       
4.224.123.24 [ 5 Posts ]        
4.224.51.123 [ 5 Posts ]        
4.224.123.49 [ 5 Posts ]        
4.224.222.234 [ 5 Posts ]       
4.224.51.235 [ 4 Posts ]        
4.224.123.102 [ 4 Posts ]       
4.224.114.15 [ 4 Posts ]        
4.224.114.35 [ 4 Posts ]        
4.224.114.104 [ 3 Posts ]       
4.224.51.157 [ 3 Posts ]        
4.131.54.138 [ 3 Posts ]        
4.225.124.88 [ 2 Posts ]        
4.224.114.250 [ 2 Posts ]       
4.225.123.183 [ 2 Posts ]       
4.225.115.186 [ 2 Posts ]       
4.224.123.95 [ 2 Posts ]        
4.225.112.48 [ 1 Post ]         
4.224.114.209 [ 1 Post ]        
4.225.120.246 [ 1 Post ]        
4.224.114.111 [ 1 Post ]        
4.224.123.103 [ 1 Post ]        
4.225.122.215 [ 1 Post ]

Let me know what I can do to help you stop him for good. Regards, Perl 02:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I honestly don't know what to make of this. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

M12Feb-Is larry birkhead from louisville, KT?

Y did u add a Louisville KT stub to Larry Birkhead's page? Was he born there? Raised there? Lived there? If he is from KT, please add more info. LB has been in the media since september after Danilyn was born, but only recently did he get a wiki page. Thx. comment by 208.58.196.156 09:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

News programs in Louisville have called Birkhead a "Louisville native". I will try to find a reference. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Kentucky Theater

Regarding your move of "Kentucky Theatre" to Kentucky Theater (Lexington)...are you sure it's spelled like the one in Louisville? The KT's own website [1] spells it "Theatre". - Draeco 21:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I think I did this years ago, and I wouldn't have done this without researching that the name was correct. As you state, the theater's website URL spells it "theater", and that's what I went off of apparently. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Enduring debate/comments

Thanks for the comments and support. When it comes to editing Wikipedia, I generally only do "bits and pieces" here and there, but I was sort of surprised at some of the American geographical stuff. I didn't intend on ending up in a multi-month heated discussion on these subjects, but looking over the edit histories on several pages, it's kind of clear to me what's going on here with this one editor. --Gator87 04:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

List of counties in Kentucky

Rfc1394 has done an awesome job using templates to shrink the size (in K) of List of counties in Kentucky. The template he used creates an external link to census data for each county. With this in mind, do you think it would be acceptable to drop the table of census data and add verbiage letting readers know that current census data is available via those external links? I think the list stands a better chance in a featured list review with just the one table. What do you think? Acdixon 15:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Whatever you think is right is OK by me. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

My Bot

I was told the go on the article page itself. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/t/e/User_talk%7EStevietheman_1H2007_7a18.html"