User talk:Steveprutz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hi, Steveprutz, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopaedia and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ; plus, if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page.

[edit] Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get around in Wikipedia:

  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
  • If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.

[edit] Current open tasks

[edit]

Here are some tasks you can do:


Good luck. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 21:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RFC

Hello. I noticed that you put a wikilink for Returned for Collection in RFC. Note that WP:WINAD indicates that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so we don't need to define every possible term. Sincer there is no Returned for Collection article, I think that listing "Returned for Collection" in RFC would only be useful if there is another, broader article that includes "Returned for Collection" to which we could refer people for explanation. Alternatively, if you feel "Returned for Collection" merits it, you could create an article, or a section in an existing article, and the disambiguation page could redirect there. Also, and I didn't find this intuitive myself so I mention it, WP:MOSDP indicates that disambiguation pages are not for exploration but to quickly guide people looking for the title term. ENeville 17:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/t/e/User_talk%7ESteveprutz_651b.html"