User talk:SteveO
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Only Fools If They Could See Us Now.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Only Fools If They Could See Us Now.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Oliver Holt
you are mean why do you keep unvandalising stuff —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.194.74.215 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 19 February 2007.
- 'cos I'm a spoil sport ;-) SteveO 13:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Excelen. --Dreaded Walrus 18:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism in my page. It is greatly appreciated! --Goochelaar 23:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Twat
What's it like to be the most hated individual on Wikipedia? Just wondering. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.189.125.12 (talk • contribs) 18:15 2 March 2007.
- It has its merits. Would you like an autograph?
- PS. You need to brush up on your spelling, mate. You don't spell twit with an a. SteveO 18:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Don't want your autograph. Wouldn't mind a peek at your man-jugs though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.189.125.12 (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC).
- Join the queue. SteveO 02:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't want your autograph. Wouldn't mind a peek at your man-jugs though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.189.125.12 (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Petr Čech and Rob Hulse
Why does a paragraph about Rob Hulse breaking his ankle belong on the Petr Čech page? SteveO 22:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't delete text for no reason. It was an accident but Petr Čech broke it. Čech raced out to smother his effort and in the collision the Blades top-scorer suffered an horrific injury when his ankle appeared to snap beneath him [1]. (JoeWiki 22:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC))
- I did delete it with a reason, the reason being that, imo, it is non-notable. Wikipedia is not a news service. SteveO 22:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you genuinely believe this is non-notable then why have you made similar changes yourself in the past when Chelsea players have accidentally been injured. Čech breaking Hulse's ankle [2] was an accident. Fortunately these accidents are rare in football but you can't deny this is a notable event in Čech's career. Please do not continue to delete which could be seen as manipulation of Wikipedia. (JoeWiki 07:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC))
- I did delete it with a reason, the reason being that, imo, it is non-notable. Wikipedia is not a news service. SteveO 22:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: One-club man
I was going to say that maybe we should only include players who have retired, but then I thought that discriminates against current players who have shown loyalty to their club (Francesco Totti, for example, who I think I added to the list myself). I feel ten years, while an admirable length of service for current players, is still somewhat too soon to qualify for inclusion in the list, and a twenty-year tenure rarely happens. So, on the talk page, we could offer the choice of a) a minimum of fifteen years of service for current players to make the list, or b) include retired-only players. Your thoughts on that? - Dudesleeper · Talk 13:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Only Fools Stage Fright.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Only Fools Stage Fright.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ITFC FAC
Hey, thanks, not only for your comments, but the time you've taken to come back and check out changes made due to your suggestions, very much appreciated. All the best... The Rambling Man 16:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)