User talk:Steptrip

If anyone else could review me at Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip, I would greatly appreciate it.

Feel free to email me, but only as a last resort.

	This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III
	Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived here. An index of the archives may be found here.

	This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot
	Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived here.

Archives September 2006 – February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007

[edit] Reply

I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. --TeckWiz^ParlateContribs_@

[edit]  :)

Please sign my sig book! :) (not)(listening)

[edit] Signature

I don't mind either when it comes to coding size, but the second looks better. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I see you found my brother's page, ! He isn't on wikipedia very much, but I think I can change that! [[User:Chiefsfan364]|Chiefsfan364][[User:Chiefsfan364/Talk]|(talk)]]

[edit] Spoiler tags

On the Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? page, you asked in an edit summary why the statistics section needed spoiler tags. I live on the west coast, and on March 22, 2007, I looked up it's Wikipedia article. The Statistics section included information as to how far the contestant had progressed in the show, presumably from someone who lives on the east coast who watched the show three hours earlier. This is why I added a Spoiler tag to the section. -- RoninBK _{T C} 00:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

(In response to comment left on my Talk,) My personal opinion is that I don't like these sections in general, especially for television shows in their first season. I think it tends to lead to WP:CRUFT, and includes information that may not be considered interesting ten years from now. However I'm not pushing for that at this point. I do think that SOME reference should be made though, perhaps somethign like {{In-progress tvshow}} or something.

[edit] help!

I am in my sandbox, working on a new signature. I am trying to clean it up, but its frustrating work! Do you think you could help me? Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello?

Are you still there? There was an edit conflict, and I'm not sure if you saw my message, due to the fact it is above the other one. This is what I have so far- User:Chiefsfan364/SandboxChiefsfan364 (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Page Protection

Sorry for the vandalism. I've reprotected your userpage for 3 fortnights, hopefully that will be long enough to be rid of them! Thanks, — xaosflux ^Talk 01:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] He didn't

Adams didn't do that. He just was logged on when I, Mr. Fan, wrote that message. I tried to come up with some sort of sig, but that didn't work. sorry! --Mr. Fan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adams921 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

No, Adams has not been adopted. He is not very smart, putting his last name, and my last name also. I AM NOT ADAMS921! --Mr. Fan

[edit] Adoption

Adams921- You can adopt me. Chiefsfan- I really wish I was logged on right now... :) Adams921 01:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Confused in Confusionland

Am I the only one that's confused by the precious two comments? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Comments

Duly noted.--Dr who1975 02:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your userpage

No problem Step. It looks better that way. ;-) Anyways, I copied it from two other people, so it's not really "my" page after all. Also, I notice you say "Do not edit this page" and "Do not vandalize", but that complex, incomprehensible coding is where vandals do their worst... Put your main page coding in a subpage, then add it to your main page as if it were a template (with double brackets around the page name); that makes your page come up, but "Vandalproof"! :-) Good luck! · AO ^Talk 08:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

To prevent a forest fire, I've replied to you at User_talk:Xaosflux#Unprotection. Thanks, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Hidden Text

Did you get that idea of hidden text at the top of your talk page from my userpage?  ~Steptrip 02:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Which hidden text? — zero » 02:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

The first text that you can see between <!----> if you click on the "edit this page" button.  ~Steptrip 02:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you mean the code in User:Z.E.R.O./Title? — zero » 02:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that page, and this one.  ~Steptrip 02:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I am using the same hidden code as yours but with some alteration. — zero » 02:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Example:

<!-- 
======================================================================================================================================
{{HEADER}}:

{{TEXT}} 

{{CLOSING}}, 


{{SIGNATURE}}
======================================================================================================================================
-->

— zero » 02:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Review

Hi Steptrip, just to let you know, I'm a bit busy today to review you, but I will certainly give you one either tomorrow or monday. Hope thats OK for you, regards Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ...!

!!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Xiner

LOL, we freaked for a second, until Cremepuff222 had an epiphany:

While typing this message, I just had a sudden thought: isn't it April Fool's Day, UTC time?? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

He is so evil. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

He definitely deserves a place there. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!)

[edit] User page

Well, actually I copied my userpage from AndonicO, not the other way around. Sorry. :/ You can ask hiim if you like. However, I will say that your userpage looks quite nice. :) Captain panda In vino veritas 00:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IP

May I ask why? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I think it is. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm literally hysterical!! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

• Thanks for the support position. However, I've decided to withdraw my acceptance because of real WP:CIVIL concerns. I will try again later when I've proven to myself and others that my anger will no longer interfere with my abilities as a Wikipedia editor. Thanks again, and I'll see you around here shortly. :) JuJube 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from 3 apples high, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Oo7565 07:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Category: Discussion pages automatically archived by Werdnabot