User talk:Stephen Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page! Leave a message and I'll reply when I can.
User talk:Stephen Day/Archive 1
Contents |
[edit] Reversion
Hey I think the thing is we are both pedantic about the real name in the intros. I'm anally retentive so I'm matching as much of the Marvel articles as I can since the majority go [codename] ([real name]) and you i think prefer the [codename] (real name: [real name]). It's a preference thing (I prefer the codename (realname) and you prefer the other way) so what should we do about it since when I change the articles eventually you will change them back and so on and so on until possibly I break the wikipedia in half :-p RIANZ 22:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I hope I made sense. Usually I don't and ramble incoherently. RIANZ 22:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I do agree with you to a point but I don't think you and I will agree on this :-p. The reason I do it the way I do is simply because it's more "eye appealing", a majority of the articles (including fictional characters outside the Marvel U) are like the way I change it to. I do make allowances though, like Luke Cage. I'm just more anally retentive that's all. Though I think we're both in the right and don't think the other contribs would take part in a discussion about which one should be used or whether or not I should bitch to make you stop since you're not in the wrong. It's just we will end up both tailing each other over the next few months as I go along and change History and Biography to Fictional character biography and putting in the citations then loop back around and check on the ones that may get changed back and then reverse your intro change etc. But yes your reasoning isn't wrong. It's sound. So is mine :-p. So what to do? RIANZ 01:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- sigh* Looks like it will be up to us to decide which way to go since we are indeed both right. Though had no idea what the first response meant but hey :-p RIANZ 18:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- "I deem it so and it shall be done" :-p Hehe. That's ok mate... though makes me seem like I'm a former Catholic Schoolteacher or Spoilt Heiress. But at least this is much more amicable than what I've seen on this site with other disputes. I was wondering though did you used to update just the Marvel character articles or all comic character articles because I only do the Marvel/Ultraverse/Amalgam/Wildstorm characters. Also, does this mean I "don't touch" the articles you've already done? I'm all confuddled since I really can't be bothered thinking right now. :-p
- I do agree with you to a point but I don't think you and I will agree on this :-p. The reason I do it the way I do is simply because it's more "eye appealing", a majority of the articles (including fictional characters outside the Marvel U) are like the way I change it to. I do make allowances though, like Luke Cage. I'm just more anally retentive that's all. Though I think we're both in the right and don't think the other contribs would take part in a discussion about which one should be used or whether or not I should bitch to make you stop since you're not in the wrong. It's just we will end up both tailing each other over the next few months as I go along and change History and Biography to Fictional character biography and putting in the citations then loop back around and check on the ones that may get changed back and then reverse your intro change etc. But yes your reasoning isn't wrong. It's sound. So is mine :-p. So what to do? RIANZ 01:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
RIANZ 22:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Ahh gotcha. I didn't see the boldness of the brackets. I seriously think that I need my contacts check. But yeah that is doable. DC Comics is all yours though. Edit as you wish ;D RIANZ 23:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Request for Comment
There's been a Request for Comment initiated at Talk:John Buscema#Request for Comment: NPOV and images, concerning a dispute over alleged violations and which includes links to two versions of an article, for comparison.
You're a regular and diligent contributor to WikiProject Comics, and so might be a knowledgeable and disinterested party who could add an informed opinion. --Tenebrae 18:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Digger (comics)
Actually, when editing that article I don't recall removing any information from it - just moving it around. The paragraph that was under "fictional character biography" didn't really fit there as well as it did under "publication history", so that's where I moved it to. Still, I like the way Tenebrae handled it better than both the previous version and my revision, so I have no complaints. :) 24.136.11.242 06:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Doomsday + 1
Thanks, Stephen! Always good to see you! -- Tenebrae 05:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
List of Marvel Comics endearments has been nominated — unfortunately, I believe — for deletion. If you wouldn't mind taking a look at the article and adding a comment, pro or con, at its "Articles for Deletion" discussion, then the article can at least be assured of a fair and knowledgeable hearing by editors familiar with the context. Thanks --Tenebrae 05:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
